Candidates for statewide appellate courts
Brandon Neuman
Since 2017, Judge Neuman has served on the Washington County Court of Common Pleas, during which he has presided over family, criminal, civil and veteran’s specialty court proceedings. Prior to joining the bench, Judge Neuman was elected to 4 terms in the PA House of Representatives where he authored landmark legislation to reform the processing of rape kits. A lifelong resident of Washington County, Judge Neuman lives in Eighty Four with his wife and four children.
Neuman – Questionnaire
1. Describe your legal experiences in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas including the Civil, Criminal, Family and Orphans Divisions and why these experiences qualify you to be a judge.
I am currently in my 8th year as a judge in Washington County running for Superior Court. I presided over family law cases, dependency matters, criminal matters, civil matters, and veterans court. I am an appointed member, by the Governor, to the Sheriff and Deputy Sheriff Training and Education Board. I am also an appointed member, by the Speaker of the House, to America250PA. I was elected to four terms in the PA House of Representatives. While in the legislature, the Speaker of the House appointed me to the PA Commission on Sentencing, the Attorney General appointed me to a committee on the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency, and I held various other positions while in the legislature.
While in the PA House, I was the prime sponsor of HB 272, requiring among other things that sexual assault testing kits be processed in a timely manner. This legislation continues to provide timely justice to sexual assault victims. Prior to being elected judge, I was a trial attorney for a firm in Pittsburgh where I was named one of the top trial lawyers in Pennsylvania under the age of 40 multiple times.
2. Briefly describe something you have done as an attorney that you are especially proud of and why you are proud of that work.
I am in my 8th year as a judge and I am proud of all the work I’ve done while on the bench. I am also proud of the meaningful work I did as a plaintiffs’ attorney protecting vulnerable senior citizens who were abused in nursing home settings.
3. If elected, describe how you would balance the use of restorative justice tools against delivering procedural justice for the victims of crime and ensuring public safety.
Since I am already a judge and preside over Veterans Court (a diversionary program), I will continue to implement all the tools available to make sure the defendant does not recidivate and protect the community with proper monitoring. As an appellate judge, I will volunteer to be part of committees to enhance programs across the commonwealth.
Stella Tsai
Stella Tsai now serves as a Judge of the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, Orphans’ CourtDivision, having served with distinction in the Criminal, Civil, and Family Court Divisions. Judge Tsai is well-known for her legal acumen, writing, professionalism, high ethical standards, and commitment to justice. A graduate of University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (1988) and The Pennsylvania State University (1985), Judge Tsai has earned honors for professional excellence, community involvement, and ethics. Born in Harrisburg to immigrant parents who came to Pennsylvania seeking political and personal freedom, Judge Tsai grew up with a deep appreciation for democracy.
Stella Tsai – Questionnaire
1. Describe your legal experiences in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas including the Civil, Criminal, Family and Orphans Divisions and why these experiences qualify you to be a judge.
I have extensive experience serving as a judge across the Criminal, Civil, Orphans’ Court, and Family Court Divisions in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas. I have not had the opportunity to either practice or serve in the Allegheny County Court of Common CountyPleas. My 35 plus years of experience in law and the judiciary have equipped me with the skills and insights necessary to address the complex social, economic, and governmental issues facing our Commonwealth. As a judge, I have worked tirelessly to deliver justice without fear or favor and will continue to do so if elected to the Commonwealth Court. My goal is to ensure that our legal system serves the needs of our diverse community with unwavering dedication, upholding the highest standards of judicial excellence and integrity.
2. Briefly describe something you have done as an attorney that you are especially proud of and why you are proud of that work.
As an attorney, I am most proud of a trial I handled which took place in 2007 when my trial partner from the City Law Department and I secured a preliminary injunction on behalf of the City of Philadelphia against SEPTA, restraining SEPTA from carrying out discriminatory elements of a fare plan (i.e. the elimination of paper transfers) by showing that SEPTA had “manifestly and flagrantly” abused its discretion. The Commonwealth Court then denied the appeal of that decision as moot because the transportation agency had adopted a new fare plan. It was exhilarating to work with a host of City employees, transportation advocates, and transportation experts who united together to stop this ill-conceived fare plan from taking effect.
3. If elected, describe how you would balance the use of restorative justice tools against delivering procedural justice for the victims of crime and ensuring public safety.
Criminal judges have three objectives: to protect the public, hold convicted defendants accountable for their actions, and rehabilitate the defendant so they may reenter society as a productive citizen. The tools of restorative justice can be very useful, if the parties are open to them, in achieving the appropriate balance among these objectives and securing a result that will help the victim to feel safe again and the defendant to accept responsibility and repair the harm. I am aware that restorative justice has been highly productive in war-torn countries such as Uganda where they had to repatriate child soldiers, and have reason to believe the same lessons would apply here. If I were successful in my bid for Commonwealth Court, I would not have direct involvement with criminal cases where restorative justice might be employed, but I believe it is useful for any jurist to have an understanding of how restorative justice works.
Candidates for the Allegheny Court of Common Pleas
The Club’s Endorsed Candidates
(listed in the order they will appear on the ballot)
Amanda Green-Hawkins
Amanda Green-Hawkins graduated from Northeastern University School of Law in 2001. Passed the Bar in 2003 and has been actively practicing law for the 22 years since then. During her career she has tried approximately 25 cases.
Amanda is a wife and a mother, who manages to work full-time as a union lawyer.
Amanda served on Allegheny County Council (2008-2015), and led the passage of legislation that prohibits discrimination based on gender identity or expression. In 2019, Amanda was the PA Democratic nominee for Superior Court judge.
Amanda is a voter-protection attorney and served on the PA Democratic Party’s Lawyers Steering Committee. Amanda serves on the boards of several non-profit organizations, and has frequently appeared as a guest on television in the Pittsburgh area.
Amanda has received numerous awards for her leadership in politics and in the community, and was appointed to Pittsburgh’s Community Task Force on Police Reform.
An alumna of Duke University and Northeastern University School of Law, Amanda was an Adjunct Professor teaching Labor Law in her most recent endeavor to pay it forward.
Amanda Green-Hawkins – Questionnaire Response
- Describe your legal experiences in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas including the Civil,Criminal, Family and Orphans Divisions and why these experiences qualify you to be a judge.
I have vast legal experience that includes mediation, arbitration, federal and state administrative agencies, and federal and state courts, including the Civil Division of Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas. I also have experience as a mediator. While my experiences in the Court of Common Pleas certainly give me familiarity with the court, I will draw from the totality of my legal experience, which makes me uniquely qualified for the Court of Common Pleas. As a professional, I have had to become familiar with the law in various settings and in various jurisdictions. These experiences have sharpened my legal research skills, and my ability to multi-task, along with diversifying my knowledge in different areas of the law. A judge in our Court of Common Pleas may hear matters where they have a clear understanding of the law, and they may hear matters where the area of the law is a matter of first impression for them. As an attorney for our nation’s largest industrial union, and only one of about 2,000 or so attorneys that the AFL-CIO considers a union lawyer, my career has been built on handling static legal situations and matters while also relying on the ability to quickly adapt to dynamic legal situations and matters. If elected to be a judge in the Court of Common Pleas, I will be ready to serve on day one in any division with the skills that I have acquired throughout our country’s legal system, including the Court of Common Pleas. - Briefly describe something you have done as an attorney that you are especially proud of and why you are proud of that work.
I represented a client, pro bono, whose livelihood was taken away when the state revoked their license, without due process. They were discouraged about the prospects of regaining the license after talking to a few attorneys over a number of years. I pursued the matter in court, and was successful in getting the license restored. They could return to operating their business for the benefit of their family and the community. - If elected, describe how you would balance the use of restorative justice tools against delivering procedural justice for the victims of crime and ensuring public safety.
The court’s approach must be built on treating people with dignity and respect, which has been the foundation of my career as a union lawyer. Procedural justice would need to be considered before we can discuss restorative justice because the impact of crimes must be understood before we can discuss someone’s return to the community or society. In which case, people must be given the opportunity to be heard so they can tell their stories and describe how they have been impacted by the crime. I would need to assess and address my personal biases to improve my decision-making and to improve peoples’ trust in our judicial system. This would include improving my own cultural competency by learning more about different people and their respective culture and experience. This would strengthen my understanding of the people I have been elected to serve.
From there, we can discuss how to repair a community or relationships between those harmed and those who have caused the harm in a community. - If you are one of the candidates who was recently appointed to the Court of Common Pleas by Gov. Shapiro, and the President Judge has assigned you to a division other than the Family Division, please explain how your professional experience will inform your approach to serving in that Division.
It is not uncommon for people to represent themselves in the Family Division. When I served as a mediator, I was often working with people where one or neither side had a lawyer. Those experiences, which often included familial or other relationships which broke down, would guide me. I would always treat people with dignity and respect, which is essential for people to be heard and for due process. People must be fully heard, otherwise, I would lack information that may be important for the decisions that must be made. I would also want to know if they had an opportunity to consult with a lawyer. If not, I would ask if they contacted the bar association’s lawyer referral service, or other legal aid or legal service provider in their community. I would invite them to discuss issues that were important to them for an amicable resolution, if possible. If not, I would take the time to explain the legal process for their case and why the process was important, and the reasons for the decisions being made. I know from my experiences working with judges that they must also be teachers to help people understand what happens and to build trust in the system.
Amanda Green Hawkins – Writing Sample
Bryan Neft
Bryan graduated from the Boston University School of Law in 1989 and passed the bar in 1990. Bryan has practiced law as a trial attorney for 30 years since 1990. During that time, he tried between 15-20 cases.
Bryan is a fourth generation-Pittsburgher. He and his wife Julie, live in Mt. Lebanon where they raised their three children. Bryan received his undergraduate degree from the University of Pennsylvania and his law degree from Boston University. Although he started his career in Pittsburgh working for several local law firms as a clerk, his career began in earnest in 1991 when he took a position as a clerk for a judge on the Pennsylvania Superior Court. There he became familiar with all of the types of cases that go before the Courts of Common Pleas, and since then he has practiced in all of the divisions of the Court of Common Pleas. Bryan has been a leader in the Allegheny County Bar Association and other community organizations.
Bryan Neft – Questionnaire Response
- Describe your legal experiences in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas including the Civil,Criminal, Family and Orphans Divisions and why these experiences qualify you to be a judge.
My experience with the Court of Common Pleas goes back thirty-five years. I have practiced in all divisions of the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas. During my clerkship with the Honorable William F. Cercone of the Pennsylvania Superior Court, I reviewed many cases that were filed in each and every division of the Court of Common Pleas. I therefore come with a solid background of understanding the substantive areas of law and the rules of practice for each of the divisions. Most of my work has been in the civil division of the Court. There are very few candidates for the Court of Common Pleas who have the breadth of knowledge that I have for the civil division. I understand how cases progress and are tried in Allegheny County. In fact, I have been an author of several chapters of the Pennsylvania Bar Institute’s Civil Practice Manual for the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas.
I have also practiced in the family division and continue to take protection from abuse matters pro bono. Cases dealing with divorce, custody and property distribution have specific standards by which judges consider the cases and I am well-versed in those standards having reviewed those issues on appeal. I have also handled matters in Orphan’s Court, dealing with trusts and estates, and in the criminal division, representing criminal defendants from inception through appeal. My experiences in all of the divisions make me unique in my ability to serve in any of the divisions and allow me to hit the proverbial ground running. - Briefly describe something you have done as an attorney that you are especially proud of and why you are proud of that work.
There are many things that as an attorney I am proud of. I derive a great deal of satisfaction helping clients reach their goals, particularly when the client is an individual who may be forced to litigate issues in the court system as a result of corporate decisions that adversely affect them. One of my earliest cases involved parents of a baby born prematurely who were denied coverage for neonatal care because the insurance company claimed the newborn had not been added to the policy. I prepared the pleadings and papers in the matter for another attorney until I was admitted to the Northern District of West Virginia, at which time I took over the entire representation of the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff lived in Ohio across the river from Wheeling, West Virginia. I filed the claim in the Northern District of West Virginia against the insurer even though the hospital services they refused to cover were rendered in New York. I was successful in having the Court retain jurisdiction and venue over the defendant based upon nationwide service of process and the convenience to the Plaintiff. The case settled for an amount that satisfied the outstanding hospital bills and paid my attorney fees. This was one of my first cases in private practice and I was so happy that I could help parents in financial distress so that they did not have to pay hospital expenses that should have been covered by insurance.
I am also proud that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has entrusted me to serve on two of their most important boards. The first board I served on was the IOLTA Board that collects and distributes funds for legal aid programs across the Commonwealth. When I began my service on the IOLTA Board, interest rates had fallen precipitously and funds from interest on lawyer trust accounts went from $14 million to about $3 million. Our board worked with the General Assembly to find alternative sources of income to make up for the shortfalls and we worked with all of the legal aid agencies across the state to ensure that every dollar stretched as far as it could. We also developed a program for attorneys working for legal aid agencies called the Loan Repayment Assistance Program (LRAP). The program repaid student loans for these attorneys to allow them to take positions with the agencies, which otherwise could not provide a competitive compensation program. The best part of the program is that it is funded exclusively from assessments on out-of-state attorneys who want to practice in Pennsylvania on a case by-case basis. No tax dollars are used to support the program.
In 2024, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court appointed me to the Disciplinary Board. This board is the largest of the Supreme Court boards and oversees discipline of attorneys who have violated the Rules of Professional Conduct. The Board manages its own operations with the guidance of the Supreme Court. Board members also hear evidence on various disciplinary proceedings against attorneys and arguments on objections to recommendations of hearing committees. It is the only board of the Supreme Court that acts as a quasi-judicial board authorized to make recommended rulings regarding attorney discipline. While it is hard work to police the profession of law, the work is necessary to maintain the integrity of the legal system.
Finally, as a member of the Allegheny County Bar Association (ACBA), I served for many years as chair of the Attorneys Against Hunger (AAH) program. AAH is a program of the Allegheny County Bar Foundation that exists not for the benefit of the profession of law but for the benefit of the greater community. In 2001, ACBA president Amy Greer asked me to take over the program. When I did, the program was steadily raising about $25,000 annually for three local agencies providing hunger relief programs: The Greater Pittsburgh Community Food Bank, Just Harvest, and Hunger Services Network.
I embarked on establishing greater awareness of the campaign and educating bar association members about hunger in Allegheny County. I began by speaking at every bar association section meeting to ask for donations from members. I also set up volunteer outreach so that members could experience what the agencies that we supported were doing to fight hunger insecurity.
Over the next five years, contributions to the campaign increased to about $115,000 annually. With the newfound funds, the campaign was able to expand its reach to more hunger relief agencies in Allegheny County including: 1) the Squirrel Hill Food Pantry, which provides kosher food to those who need it for religious purposes 2) Allies, formerly the Pittsburgh AIDS Task Force, which provides hunger relief and nutritional supplements for those suffering from HIV/AIDS. The list of supported agencies has increased since then. Although I am no longer chair of the AAH campaign, over the years the campaign has successfully raised nearly $3 million for hunger relief in Allegheny County and has offered a way for attorneys to benefit the greater Pittsburgh community that is unrelated to the profession of law. I am proud of these efforts. - If elected, describe how you would balance the use of restorative justice tools against delivering procedural justice for the victims of crime and ensuring public safety.
My understanding of restorative justice is that it encompasses voluntary programs designed to ameliorate the harm to victims and communities that criminals cause. Certainly, a common pleas court judge can facilitate restorative justice programs, but must follow the law when it comes to sentencing and post-conviction proceedings. One element of restorative justice is the defendant taking responsibility for the crimes committed and conveying that to victims and the community. Although a court may not compel a defendant to accept responsibility and apologize for the crimes committed, it is a factor the Court should take into consideration when sentencing. - If you are one of the candidates who was recently appointed to the Court of Common Pleas by Gov. Shapiro, and the President Judge has assigned you to a division other than the Family Division, please explain how your professional experience will inform your approach to serving in that Division.
My experiences with the family division of the Court of Common Pleas come primarily from my clerkship with an appellate judge. During my clerkship, I researched and drafted decisions for the court on nearly all of the issues that are directed to the family divisions including equitable distribution of assets, support, alimony, custody, protection from abuse, and, in the case of juveniles, dependency and delinquency proceedings. Judges evaluate these cases according to specific standards, and I am well-versed in those standards having reviewed these issues on appeal.
Additionally, families with cases in the Family Division need justice expeditiously. My practice is fast-paced and I have 15-20 active cases in each trial term that need to be prepared for trial. Preparation of this many cases requires me to be industrious and efficient. I believe those traits would serve me well were I to be assigned to the family division.
Bryan Neft – Writing Sample
Quita Bridges
Quita Bridges graduated from Duquesne University School of Law in 1996. Passed the Bar in 1997 and has been actively practicing law for the 27 years since then. During her career she has tried approximately 400 cases.
Quita Bridges was recently appointed by Governor Shapiro to serve on the Court of Common Pleas. She is assigned to the Criminal Division. She received a Highly Recommended by the Allegheny County Bar Association. Quita has 26 years of trial experience. As the Assistant Chief Deputy Attorney General for the Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General, Quita supervised attorneys in the day to day operation of the criminal prosecution section in Western Pennsylvania.
Quita worked 16 years for the Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office, where she served as Deputy District Attorney. She supervised 18 Assistant District Attorneys, prosecuted homicide, child abuse and domestic violence cases. She also supervised the ARD Program and Miscellaneous Motions Court.
Quita Bridges – Questionnaire Response
- Describe your legal experiences in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas including the Civil,Criminal, Family and Orphans Divisions and why these experiences qualify you to be a judge.
I was the judicial law clerk for the Honorable Cynthia A. Baldwin. Judge Baldwin was assigned to the family division of the Court of Common Pleas. During my clerkship, I conducted research on cases addressing custody, child support, spousal support, reviewed and modified court orders and responded to appeals. In June of 1998, I accepted a position with the Allegheny County District Attorney. I appeared in court on a daily basis representing the Commonwealth. I prosecuted crimes, including but not limited to, driving under the influence, drug possession and delivery, forgery, burglary, theft, robbery, aggravated assault and simple assault.
In 2001, I was promoted to the Domestic Violence Unit, which was responsible for prosecuting crimes involving intimate partners. During this period, I tried to jury verdict several cases involving rape, aggravated assault and attempted homicide. In 2009, I was selected to serve in the Child Abuse Unit. I was responsible for prosecuting cases involving child physical abuse, sexual abuse and neglect. In addition to my child abuse calendar, I was also assigned homicide cases. In 2012, I was promoted to Deputy District Attorney. In this capacity. I was responsible for supervising 18 General Trial Attorneys. In addition to my supervisory duties, I was responsible for the operation of the Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition (ARD) program. I was also responsible for Miscellaneous Motions Court where I handled cases involving bail modifications, return of seized property, adjustment of fines and costs, and extraditions. I also participated in the office Hiring Committee for assistant district attorneys.
In 2013, I was appointed by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to serve on the Criminal Rules Committee. This committee helped to develop rules governing criminal practice and procedure. I left the District Attorney’s Office in 2014 and joined the Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General, where I am currently employed. I initially served as Senior Deputy Attorney General prosecuting various crimes in 23 counties in western Pennsylvania. In October 2018, I was promoted by Attorney General Josh Shapiro to Assistant Chief Deputy Attorney General of the Criminal Prosecution Section.
In this capacity, I am responsible for overseeing prosecutors, assigned to the section, who are responsible for the investigation and prosecution of criminal offenses varying from criminal homicide to public corruption cases. I also personally handle and supervise Grand Jury Investigations. I have 26 years of trial court experience which would qualify me to serve as judge. I have handled both filed cases and those in the investigative stage. I have had multiple jury trials and non jury trials. I have filed and argued motions before the court. I have analyzed evidence thoroughly, weighed evidence objectively and made informed decisions based on my evaluation. I have the disposition and temperament that is necessary for a judge. I understand the law and courtroom procedures. - Briefly describe something you have done as an attorney that you are especially proud of and why you are proud of that work.
I conducted an extensive investigation on child sexual abuse allegations. I had multiple interviews to prepare this child for trial. I initially did not want to put her on the witness stand because she was only 11 years old. My concern was not only that she would have to talk in front of a room full of strangers, thus re-victimizing her, but I also did not want her to have a setback from the progress she had made through therapy. The defendant would not accept a plea offer so I had no choice but to have a trial. This child by far was one of the best witnesses I have ever had. She was fearless and confident on the day she testified. She listened attentively and the words that came from her had the “ring of truth”. The jury returned a guilty verdict. I am proud of this case because I was able to get justice for this young girl and her mother. This type of case is often very difficult to prove so a guilty verdict was very satisfying. - If elected, describe how you would balance the use of restorative justice tools against delivering procedural justice for the victims of crime and ensuring public safety.
Using restorative justice requires flexibility. Restorative justice is more suitable for lower-level offenses where rehabilitation can effectively prevent reoffending. The accused would have to accept responsibility and be willing to make amends. I would ensure that the victim has a voice in the decision. It would be important for me to have complete transparency and give the victim a choice in whether they want to participate in the process. There would also have to be a risk assessment\ to determine the offender’s risk to the community. I would ensure that justice is applied consistently and educate the public about why restorative justice is used. This will help to maintain confidence in the legal system. - If you are one of the candidates who was recently appointed to the Court of Common Pleas by Gov. Shapiro, and the President Judge has assigned you to a division other than the Family Division, please explain how your professional experience will inform your approach to serving in that Division.
I was recently appointed by Gov. Shapiro to serve on the Court. I have been assigned to the Criminal Division. I have handled many complex cases, grand jury proceedings, and investigations. I understand the complexities of building a case, the challenges in proving charges and the nuances of legal arguments. This experience will help me approach cases with fairness, ensuring that both the prosecution and defense are held to the appropriate legal standard. My work has required me to apply criminal statutes, evidentiary rules, and procedural requirements. As a judge, this knowledge will allow me to efficiently manage court proceedings, rule on evidentiary matters and issue well-reasoned decisions that are supported by the law. I have firsthand experience with the impact of a crime on victims and the community. This perspective will ensure that I will uphold procedural justice for victims while also considering appropriate sentencing and diversion options that balance accountability with rehabilitation. I have always been committed to transparency and accountability. As a judge, you will bring these principles to the bench, ensuring that all parties are treated with respect and that court proceedings maintain integrity. The foundation and experience that I have will allow me to serve as a knowledgeable, fair, and decisive judge who upholds the law while considering the real-world impact of my decisions.
Quita Bridges – Writing Sample
Alyssa Cowan
Alyssa Cowan graduated from Temple University Beasley School of Law in 2004. Passed the Bar in 2004 and has been actively practicing as a trial attorney for the past 17 years. During her career she has tried approximately 500 cases as sole counsel.
Appointed to the Court of Common Pleas by Governor Shapiro, Judge Alyssa Cowan is uniquely qualified to earn your vote. Judge Cowan teaches child and family advocacy courses at the University of Pittsburgh’s School of Social Work, is a proud union member, and has previously served as supervisory Assistant County Solicitor in the Allegheny County Law Department. Having spent thousands of hours in the courtroom, Judge Cowan knows that the days spent by families in front of a judge are some of the most difficult of their entire lives. To that point, she has one simple yet important commitment: treat any member of your family, should they appear before her, with the care and attention she’d want for her own.
Alyssa Cowan – Questionnaire Response
- Describe your legal experiences in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas including the Civil,Criminal, Family and Orphans Divisions and why these experiences qualify you to be a judge.
Throughout my career as an attorney, I have appeared as the petitioning party, acting as sole counsel, in hundreds of child welfare cases that I have tried to verdict. Many of these cases have companion adult criminal proceedings and dually adjudicated delinquent youth cases which requires working on a multidisciplinary team to address the matters pending in all Divisions including with our counterparts in the Criminal Division. In addition, many of the matters that I handle proceed to adoption and/or termination of parental rights proceedings as well as adult guardianship proceedings in the Orphans Division. - Briefly describe something you have done as an attorney that you are especially proud of and why you are proud of that work.
In all of my cases as an attorney, I take pride in the collaborative work I have undertaken with opposing counsel to achieve positive outcomes that serve the needs of all parties involved. I believe that my dual-degree background and interdisciplinary approach uniquely position me to address the complex challenges that bring families into the courtroom. As to a specific case, one client of mine was a teenage girl who had been sexually abused by her mother’s boyfriends while her mother battled a substance use disorder. As a result of this significant childhood trauma, she experienced multiple home and school placements. Despite her bright, inquisitive nature, her schools would funnel her into disciplinary classrooms because of her past placement history instead of nurturing her potential. As her court-appointed attorney, I advocated for her to be fully assessed and placed in courses according to her academic ability not her foster care history. As a result, she was able to achieve her goal of becoming a college bound student and nurse. My experience representing clients like this teenage girl inspired me to develop a training entitled “Meeting the Educational Needs of Children in Care” focused on developing skills to address the unique challenges faced by foster care children in their school settings. As a legal trainer for the Statewide Adoption and Permanency Network, I presented this training across the State to judges, hearing officers, caseworkers, probation officers, behavioral health providers, and foster care families. - If elected, describe how you would balance the use of restorative justice tools against delivering procedural justice for the victims of crime and ensuring public safety.
Restorative justice seeks to understand crime in its social context and to examine the social conditions that may be the root causes of crime in order to break the cycle of crime in communities. Restorative justice aims to empower victims to participate in dialogue with their offenders and for offenders to take accountability for their actions. As an attorney who holds a degree in social work, I was trained in utilizing the social-ecological model to understand social problems and how to best address them. The social-ecological model considers the complex interplay between individuals, their community, and their society. Restorative justice approaches are often more likely to sustain prevention efforts over time and achieve an impact across an entire population, not just on individual participants. Given these positive outcomes for the victim, perpetrator, and community as a whole, there is a role for restorative justice in the Court of Common Pleas. - If you are one of the candidates who was recently appointed to the Court of Common Pleas by Gov. Shapiro, and the President Judge has assigned you to a division other than the Family Division, please explain how your professional experience will inform your approach to serving in that Division.
Recently I was appointed to the Court of Common Pleas by Governor Shapiro with the sponsorship of Senator Lindsey Williams and Senator Jay Costa and assigned to the Family Division as a Judge to fill a judicial vacancy. I am seeking election to a full ten-year term. I am dedicated to ensuring that every family and child interacting with the court system in Allegheny County has access to fair, equitable, effective, and timely justice. Children deserve court interventions focused on ensuring their safety and maintaining their well-being. Over the course of my career, I have developed the skill set needed to make a valuable contribution and be effective in the role of Judge in the Family Division. I have local, state, national, and international experience. I have worked as both Guardian ad Litem and Assistant County Solicitor in child welfare cases on the local level. I have provided trainings on a variety of child welfare laws across the state of Pennsylvania as a legal trainer for the Statewide Adoption and Permanency Network. In my work at both the ABA Center on Children and the Law and the Field Center for Children’s Policy, Practice, and Research at Penn, I worked on federal foster care legislation and research projects at the national level. Internationally, I have presented twice at the International Society of Family Law World Conferences- 2000 in Brisbane Australia and 2017 in Amsterdam, Netherlands. I am also an Adjunct Faculty Member at the University of Pittsburgh School of Social Work where I teach: Children and Families at Risk; Child and Family Advocacy; and Advocacy and Lobbying for Non-Profit Organizations. I am a proud member of the Pitt Faculty Union through the United Steelworkers. As a professional with both a law degree and a master’s degree in social work, I am able to navigate the complex legal and emotional aspects of working in the Family Division. Families and children appear in the courtroom in crisis often having experienced significant trauma in their lives. My goals as a Judge is for families to have the opportunity to be heard on a level playing field in the courtroom, to leave their hearings with confidence in the judicial system, and to have peace with the result whether it is their preferred outcome or not.
Alyssa Cowan – Writing Sample
Lauren Leiggi
Lauren Leiggi graduated from Temple Law School in 2021. Passed the Bar in 2021 and has been actively practicing law for the 4 years since then. During her career she has worked on approximately 25-30 cases that have gone to trial. She has been the lead on three jury trials and sat as second seat on two.
Lauren is a Public Defender, representing indigent clients facing criminal charges across the county. Lauren has advocated for thousands of clients at every stage of trial with cases ranging from DUIs to attempted homicide. Lauren is the lead attorney for the immigration consequences group, which advises individuals facing criminal charges about potential immigration ramifications and coordinates with local and international immigration organizations. Lauren intimately understands how our community is impacted by the daily decisions made in the Court of Common Pleas.
Lauren’s dedication to public service spans over a decade. Lauren currently serves as the Local Bargaining Unit President in the new USW Local 9002 amalgamation, representing Public Defenders, Assistant District Attorneys, Medical Examiners and Court Records employees. Lauren graduated from the University of Pennsylvania and Temple Law School, and she currently lives in Point Breeze North with her wife Sarah and their rescue animals..
Lauren Leiggi – Questionnaire Response
- Describe your legal experiences in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas including the Civil,Criminal, Family and Orphans Divisions and why these experiences qualify you to be a judge.
As a Public Defender, I am in the criminal courthouse constantly, averaging four days a week, every week, in several courtrooms a day. I have represented thousands of clients at every stage of trial – from preliminary hearings to jury trials and everything in between – and on every type of case, from DUIs and retail thefts to homicides. Zealously advocating for my clients has given me experience litigating motions, doing various types of trials, and speaking with Judges both on and off the record.
The sheer amount and variety of legal experiences I have had means that I know what works – and what doesn’t work. I have the experience needed to be creative in utilizing the legal system to both repair harm and to empower our community to prevent future harm.
I have the potential to be a different kind of a judge: one that has the professional experience to be creative in utilizing the legal system, and one who has lived the same reality as the people appearing before them. - Briefly describe something you have done as an attorney that you are especially proud of and why you are proud of that work.
In my first year at the Allegheny County Public Defender’s Office, I started the Immigration Consequences Group (ICG), which provides assistance to non-citizen clients facing criminal charges. To date, this group has advised over 800 non-citizen clients — college students, construction workers, and almost life-long Allegheny County residents alike — about the different risks they face within the criminal legal system. Additionally, the ICG has taught numerous legal education events, created online training programs for the Public Defender Association of Pennsylvania, and forged relationships with foreign consulates and local organizations to better support our community members. - If elected, describe how you would balance the use of restorative justice tools against delivering procedural justice for the victims of crime and ensuring public safety.
Restorative justice means considering how the entire community will heal from whatever incident brought them to court. It means equipping individuals who cause harm with the tools needed to reintegrate them into the community without causing harm in the future. It also means creating space for those who are harmed to participate in that healing process, emphasizing the need for accountability to repair community relationships. This approach is needed in Allegheny County, as it helps solve discrete incidents and improves community relationships to prevent future incidents. - If you are one of the candidates who was recently appointed to the Court of Common Pleas by Gov. Shapiro, and the President Judge has assigned you to a division other than the Family Division, please explain how your professional experience will inform your approach to serving in that Division.
If elected, I would look forward to any time spent in the Family Division, particularly the juvenile family division. Too often family court can tear apart families, impacting them for generations. I would give it the utmost care and attention. In my professional experience I have worked with teenagers charged with crimes, I have also advised on custody matters, and how a criminal case may impact a pending family division case.
When working with the children and families in Pittsburgh, a Judge must consider how the entire community will heal from whatever incident brought them to court. Justice means equipping individuals who cause harm with the tools needed to reintegrate them into the community without causing harm in the future. It also means creating space for those who are harmed to participate in that healing process, emphasizing the need for accountability to repair community relationships. A Judge must also recognize the ripple effect the impact their decisions will have on the community at large. Removing a child from their home is one of the most traumatizing things a child can experience. The school to prison pipeline has become too big of a reality for so many people in Allegheny County, and Judges can play an important role in making necessary changes to that failure of our system.
Lauren Leiggi – Writing Sample
Jaime Hickton
Jaime Hickton graduated from Duquesne School of Law in 2013. Passed the Bar in 2014 and has been actively practicing law for the 11 years since then. During Jaime’s career she has tried approximately 40 cases.
Jaime is a former union member, respected attorney and advocate with nearly 20 years experience in criminal defense, family law and juvenile justice. Raised in the South Hills of Pittsburgh, Jaime is the first in her immediate family to attend college and proud to have put herself through Duquesne School of Law. Jaime’s blue-collar upbringing informs a strong work ethic and a relentless passion to fight for what’s right—skills she now brings to her legal practice to protect children and help clients navigate complex legal challenges. A former Judicial Law
Clerk and Child Abuse Prosecutor, Jaime is a Board Member for Planned Parenthood of Western PA and Pittsburgh Action Against Rape. Jaime and her wife are proud parents of three adopted children—two with special needs—making Jaime uniquely qualified to understand and navigate the child welfare system. Fair, experienced and deeply compassionate, Jaime is ready to bring her experience to the bench.
Jaime Hickton – Questionnaire Response
- Describe your legal experiences in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas including the Civil,Criminal, Family and Orphans Divisions and why these experiences qualify you to be a judge.
In July of 2015, I accepted a position with the Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office as an Assistant District Attorney. After starting in the Screening Unit, I was promoted to handle trial prosecutions in the Juvenile Unit in approximately April of 2016. In that role, I appeared in at least two courtrooms at least three days each week with a typical daily docket of approximately 30 or more cases. I was often required to appear in two courtrooms to handle more than one docket. Unique to the Juvenile Unit, I handled every type of juvenile delinquency matter including, but not limited to, misdemeanor thefts, felony and misdemeanor firearms offenses, felony rape of a child, and felony aggravated assaults. I litigated at least 10 non-jury trials and numerous omnibus pre-trial motions. I also litigated expungement requests, some of which were contested by the Commonwealth and necessitated hearings that required judicial decision/determination. Additionally, one day each week, in matters where a family was active in both the juvenile delinquency and juvenile dependency systems, those matters were heard as a “dual day.” While participating in those proceedings, I gained valuable insight into the complexities and nuances of how those systems and services interact with and impact each other.
In February of 2019, I was promoted to the Child Abuse Unit, which was responsible for prosecuting criminal cases involving physical and sexual abuse of children. During that period, I appeared in Allegheny County Criminal Court daily, and I tried to jury verdict at least three cases involving child physical and/or sexual abuse. I litigated at least three non-jury trials, argued many pre-trial motions, and handled numerous preliminary hearings before Magisterial District Courts. I also prosecuted a homicide case involving a child victim. I worked regularly with city, county, and state law enforcement agents to investigate and identify child abusers to prosecute those matters on behalf of child victims. I spent considerable time partnering with community-based organizations to facilitate services for victims and their families in an effort to end cycles of abuse and bring awareness to victims’ rights and needs. During that time, I also worked with local, state, and federal leaders as a member of the Working Together LGBTQ+ Group which identified policies within the Allegheny County Jail (“ACJ”) that were not compliant with the Prison Rape Elimination Act (“PREA”). As a result of our efforts, our group was able to work with ACJ to gain PREA compliance which substantially improved standards and safety for LGBTQIA+ individuals who were housed at ACJ.
In April of 2020, I was appointed by Governor Tom Wolf as a member of the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency, Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Committee where I served my full term until April of 2024. In that role, I routinely worked with statewide members and stakeholders to plan, coordinate, and make policy recommendations to Governor Wolf and then Governor Josh Shapiro for the purpose of developing a comprehensive, long-range plan and related policies for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s juvenile justice system. We also worked together to set priorities for various juvenile justice-related projects that were supported by the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency’s various funding streams to better support the juvenile justice systems across the Commonwealth.
In 2020, after more than 13 years in public service, I entered private practice. I first joined a small law firm in Pittsburgh. As a result of my time in both the criminal and family divisions in Allegheny County and Westmoreland County, I concentrated on representing plaintiffs and defendants in family law (divorce, custody, support, protection from abuse), criminal law, and child welfare matters. I maintained approximately 80 cases at any given time while working there, and I expanded my experience in appearing before multiple judges in the aforementioned divisions in Armstrong, Beaver, Butler, Fayette, Lawrence and Washington Counties. In family law matters, I litigated several custody trials, juvenile delinquency and dependency adjudication proceedings, and protection from abuse final hearings. During that time, I was also admitted into the Federal Public Defender – Western District of Pennsylvania’s CJA Panel Mentee Program where I was paired with CJA Panel Members to represent individuals who were charged with federal crimes in the Western District of Pennsylvania. While in that program, I appeared before several United States District Court Magistrates and United States Federal Judges on behalf of criminal defendants in the Western District of Pennsylvania.
In July of 2021, I left that firm to start my own law practice, The Law Office of Jaime M. Hickton. Nearly all of my clients came with me, and I continued to represent individuals within the Juvenile Division (juvenile delinquency and juvenile dependency), Family Division (divorce, custody, support, and protection from abuse matters), and Criminal Division in the aforementioned counties. I also expanded my practice into Indiana County. After successfully managing my solo law practice and increasing my footprint in the legal community, in April of 2022, I partnered with another colleague and former child abuse prosecutor to create Hickton + Stein Law Group, LLC. Because my law partner had experience in civil litigation, employment and labor law, business and contract law, and estate planning, my practice areas expanded to support our ever-growing law firm. We now manage four full time employees: a senior trial attorney, an associate attorney and two paralegals.
During my time in private practice, I tried to jury verdict three felony criminal cases, at least three criminal bench trials, multiple termination of parental rights matters, delinquency and dependency adjudications, and I’ve been appointed to represent at least three individuals in homicide matters in additional to dozens of other felony criminal matters. I’ve also represented clients in adoption proceedings, landlord/tenant disputes, and civil matters before Magisterial District Court Judges. In June of 2023, Washington County contracted with our law firm to provide legal representation as Special Solicitors in Juvenile Dependency matters where we represent Washington County Children & Youth Services as their Solicitor.
Having worked in the trenches as a juvenile probation officer, standing beside a parent or child when the state is trying to take that child away, or zealously arguing on behalf of a criminal defendant to avoid a lengthy prison sentence has given me a unique perspective on what really matters and the importance of the roles that we all play. Judges have a unique ability to, positively or negatively, significantly impact the life of each and every person who appears before them. For our society to function as it’s meant to, the system requires that we put people in judicial roles who intimately understand both the power and corresponding responsibility of a judge. I believe that because of my lived personal and professional journey, most of which has been in public service, I possess a unique combination of experience, skill, and temperament that will aid my ability as a judge. I spent almost 20 years in a courtroom, and I’ve worn every hat within it. I’ve been a prosecutor and a criminal defense attorney. I’ve been a foster parent, parent attorney, child attorney, and attorney for the County in child welfare cases. I’ve represented mothers, fathers, and grandparents in family law matters. I’ve held all of these roles because I believe deeply that the system, as flawed as it may be, can protect and advance justice if we have the right people in these positions of power and responsibility. That is why I’m running for Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas Judge and I hope to earn your support. - Briefly describe something you have done as an attorney that you are especially proud of and why you are proud of that work.
Now that I’m the founding partner of a law firm, I get to decide which clients to represent and how to conduct my business. I’ve worked hard to build my practice to the point where we can sustain our economic growth while also dedicating a significant portion of our practice to representing marginalized individuals. I devote a significant portion of my practice to representing low-income or pro bono clients involved in the child welfare system and the juvenile delinquency system. In that I’ve worn every hat within those systems (both personally as a foster parent who adopted all three of my children from that system and professionally in all of my positions), I am able to advocate for marginalized people within those systems in a unique way. I believe we all have a responsibility to give and serve others when we have the ability and means to do so and I feel it is my duty to give back. In one of the cases that I handled; a young black mother had her four children removed from her because a caseworker within the system essentially didn’t like her.
Before we took the case, the caseworker clearly only communicated certain parts of the facts to the Court for the purpose of convincing the judge to remove the children and to proceed towards termination of parental rights. When we took over the case, we were able to compel all of the information/facts and present other community support witnesses and the result was not only that all four of her children were returned, but the case was successfully closed. We’ve earned similar results in numerous cases for clients who couldn’t afford to hire seasoned and aggressive advocates. I prioritize taking those cases where low-income and/or marginalized parents and family members have been harmed by the system because I believe that everyone deserves justice in the courtroom and that justice shouldn’t just be accessible for the wealthy. - If elected, describe how you would balance the use of restorative justice tools against delivering procedural justice for the victims of crime and ensuring public safety.
Restorative justice should be the core of what any justice system produces. Since my time as a juvenile probation officer and even now as a criminal defense attorney, I have always focused my efforts on identifying underlying issues and unmet needs to address the root cause(s) of system involvement. Restorative justice seeks to understand the “why” of system involvement and to then focus on providing services and support to help people receive the necessary help so they can get out of the system and avoid being involved in the future. If elected, I would strive to understand the “why” in each case that comes before me so I can work to repair the harm caused to the victim (i.e. payment of restitution, return of property, victim awareness training for offenders, etc.), rehabilitate the actor (i.e. drug and alcohol assessments and/or treatment, mental health assessments and/or treatment, trauma therapy and/or other evidence-based therapy or services, job readiness programs and/or training, housing assistance and/or connection to housing providers, education assistance and/or training, etc.), and protect the community (i.e. utilize diversionary programs like electronic monitoring, community-based supervised housing, drug and alcohol treatment programs, etc).
If the system attempts to understand the “why” and provide the necessary supports and services, the goal is that the individual will not reoffend and thus the community will be safer. However, there are certainly instances where, despite the best efforts of the system and the professionals working within the system that the individual fails to comply and reoffends. In that scenario, the Courts have a duty to reassess the matter to determine whether the community will be safe if the individual is re-released or whether any set of conditions exist that would allow for release with the community being safe. The system should never strive to incarcerate people unless it is absolutely necessary, but it is a difficult balance because the community and crime victims also deserve to feel safe in their homes and in their community. If I am elected, I would apply the tenets of restorative justice in every case I handle, regardless of whether the division itself has traditionally worked to apply restorative justice and I would utilize evidence-based programs to work towards repairing the harm to victims, rehabilitating offenders, and ensuring public safety. - If you are one of the candidates who was recently appointed to the Court of Common Pleas by Gov. Shapiro, and the President Judge has assigned you to a division other than the Family Division, please explain how your professional experience will inform your approach to serving in that Division.
As explained within my answer above in Question 1, I have a significant amount of experience in the Family Division. I was a judicial law clerk in that division before I became a trial attorney. I’ve handled simple and complex family law matters since entering private practice in 2020. My legal experience has taught me that most family law matters are extremely emotional and difficult because, as a judge, you’re handling the most intimate part of people’s deeply personal lives. Often times individuals are fighting over their children and in some cases, extremely private details of a marital relationship come out during contentious divorce litigation. Most of my clients never anticipated that they would have to share that part of their life with anyone, let alone a judge who does not know them and is not seeing the case through their lens. I’ve experienced volatile matters and high conflict cases in all of the roles that I’ve had which is why I believe I’m uniquely qualified to sit in judgement of others.
It’s much easier to stay fair and calm under pressure when you focus on why you’re involved in a case. When I was a juvenile probation officer, I recommended placement for a juvenile because she was not safe in her home; there was a substantial amount of drug addiction and domestic violence with her mother and her mother’s paramour. Her father had unexpectedly passed away and she did not have any relatives or friends that could take her in. There was no other option and it was necessary to place her for a period of time in a safe and stable environment, but after the judge agreed and placed her out of home, her mother confronted me in the hallway of the courthouse. She became very aggressive towards me and threatened me in a way that required the sheriffs to intervene.
Through it all, I maintained my composure and told her that I was sorry for having to recommend removal, but that we would work together to develop a plan to get her daughter back home. While it was a tense situation, I understood that to her, I was the reason her daughter had been removed. I also understood that my role was to make safety recommendations and that, while this was extremely personal to her, I was doing my job. If a judge understands that their role is to be a fair arbiter and to seek truth and justice, a judge should not be bothered by the emotional response of litigants because litigants are often in the courtroom as a result of extremely personal and difficult matters. Most litigants don’t want to be there and they don’t want someone else making decisions about significant matters in their lives. If a judge focuses on their role, they should be able to be fair and stay calm under pressure. As a result of my extensive experience in those very circumstances, I believe that I will be fair and calm in those situations and that is why I believe that I am uniquely qualified to serve as a judge.
JAIME HICKTON – Writing Sample
Ilan Zur
Ilan graduated from the University of Pittsburgh School of Law in 1998 and passed the bar in 1998. Ilan has practiced law since 1998 and spent 26 years as a trial attorney. During that time, he tried over 400 cases before judges and juries including 60 homicide trials.
Ilan moved to Pittsburgh in 1990 to attend Carnegie Mellon University, graduating with a Bachelor of Science in Industrial Management and a Minor in Architecture. In 1998, he began working as an Assistant District Attorney in Allegheny County’s District Attorney’s Office shortly after graduating from the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. Ilan was promoted to his current position as Deputy District Attorney in 2013 and charged with supervising the Violent Crimes and Firearms Unit. Ilan lives in Squirrel Hill with his wife Lisa and their three children.
Ilan Zur – Questionnaire Response
- Describe your legal experiences in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas including the Civil,Criminal, Family and Orphans Divisions and why these experiences qualify you to be a judge.
My career has been spent practicing criminal prosecution. Over the course of my 26 year career in the Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office, I have prosecuted a wide range of criminal offenses in the general trial, narcotics, violent crimes and firearms, and homicide units. I have extensive trial experience with over 300 non-jury trials and 70 jury trials to verdict. While my trial experience is an important qualification, I also believe the perspective I have gained is equally if not more important. I have learned that every situation is not as simple as right and wrong. Just because you are in criminal court, that doesn’t mean you are a bad person. Oftentimes, people experience a series of unexpected or unfortunate events. As a judge, I will have compassion. I will not only consider the crime when sentencing, but rather the individual and the context of their lived experiences. I will make an effort to understand why someone made the choices they did. I see prison as a last resort and will strive to sentence people with an eye towards rehabilitation and reintegration. I believe that my experience, along with my perspective, uniquely qualifies me to serve on the bench. - Briefly describe something you have done as an attorney that you are especially proud of and why you are proud of that work.
A recent case stands out as a particularly proud moment in my career. It involved a man who was shot and paralyzed by someone released pending charges for illegal firearm possession. The victim’s family had a deep mistrust of law enforcement and the criminal justice system—an understandable sentiment. As a prosecutor, I see it as my responsibility to rebuild that trust within our community. I worked closely with the family, providing regular updates, always answering their calls, and tirelessly pursuing justice for the victim. Through these efforts, I helped restore their confidence in the criminal justice system. Afterwards, the family took the time to send a note of gratitude to the District Attorney’s office, commending my work and the support I provided during such a challenging time. It is moments like these that truly fill me with pride, as I strive to ensure equal and equitable access to justice for all in our community. - If elected, describe how you would balance the use of restorative justice tools against delivering procedural justice for the victims of crime and ensuring public safety.
Using restorative justice requires flexibility. Restorative justice is more suitable for lower-level offenses where rehabilitation can effectively prevent reoffending. The accused would have to accept responsibility and be willing to make amends. I would ensure that the victim has a voice in the decision. It would be important for me to have complete transparency and give the victim a choice in whether they want to participate in the process. There would also have to be a risk assessment\ to determine the offender’s risk to the community. I would ensure that justice is applied consistently and educate the public about why restorative justice is used. This will help to maintain confidence in the legal system.If elected, I would approach restorative justice with a balanced perspective by recognizing its value in certain situations, while prioritizing the needs of victims and public safety. Restorative justice can be incredibly effective in non-violent crimes, where the focus is on repairing harm, offering accountability, and providing opportunities for offenders to make amends. In these cases, I would encourage the use of restorative practices, such as victim-offender dialogues and community service, to help facilitate healing and reduce recidivism. However, when it comes to violent crimes, the cases that I specialize in at the DA’s office, the safety of the public and the need for procedural justice must take precedence. While I believe in accountability for offenders, violent crimes often have deep, lasting impacts on victims and the community. In these cases, the priority should be ensuring that justice is served through appropriate legal processes, with a focus on protecting victims’ rights and upholding public safety. By balancing restorative justice for non-violent crimes with procedural justice for victims of violent crimes, we can create a more fair and effective system that seeks to rehabilitate offenders while ensuring the rights and safety of victims and the broader community. - If you are one of the candidates who was recently appointed to the Court of Common Pleas by Gov. Shapiro, and the President Judge has assigned you to a division other than the Family Division, please explain how your professional experience will inform your approach to serving in that Division.
If assigned to the family division, I would approach my role with a deep commitment to fairness, compassion, and the understanding that family law cases often involve complex, deeply personal issues. As a criminal prosecutor specializing in violent crimes and gun violence, I have seen firsthand how familial dynamics can impact individuals, especially when violence is involved. Despite my 26 years of criminal law experience, I would still approach every case in the Family Division with the same level of attention, compassion, and integrity. I would take the time to seek advice from experts in family law and thoroughly review areas of family law that I am not as well versed in. In addition, I would make it a priority to ensure that families involved in the justice system have access to resources, such as counseling, family mediation, and support services. This would help address underlying issues that contribute to family conflict and violence. Ultimately, my approach would focus on restoring harmony and safety in families, while ensuring that justice is served for all parties involved.
Ilan Zur – Writing Sample
Anthony DeLuca
Anthony DeLuca graduated from University of PIttsburgh School of Law in 1997. He passed the Bar in 1997 and has been actively practicing law since then, working as a trial attorney for 25 years. During his career he has tried over 100 cases.
Much of Anthony’s work is as a Union Labor Attorney representing multiple Teamsters Locals in a wide variety of industries both public and private. Anthony is also a criminal defense attorney who is very proud of being heavily involved in the implementation and development of Mental Health Court in Allegheny County. Anthony is passionate about helping those with mental health and addiction struggles receive the treatment that they need. Anthony has tried hundreds of cases in Pennsylvania courts and run a successful law practice. There are reforms he would like to make to the Criminal Justice System.
Anthony DeLuca – Questionnaire Response
- Describe your legal experiences in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas including the Civil,Criminal, Family and Orphans Divisions and why these experiences qualify you to be a judge.
I believe that my wide variety of experience working with the major participants in the Criminal Justice System makes me uniquely qualified to be a judge.
The most impactful period of my career is when I was part of the small team that developed the Mental Health Court in Allegheny County. Through developing the program at its early stages and then working with the cases, I developed a more collaborative view of the criminal justice process.
With an eye toward becoming a judge later in my professional life, I tailored my career to have an opportunity to work closely with the different stakeholders in the criminal justice system. My hope is that by understanding the stresses and burdens of those involved in the system, I may fashion, through programs and my rulings, decisions that consider those needs and concerns and further the goal of justice for all.
In particular, in the DA’s office, in addition to my aforementioned work with individuals with mental health challenges, I worked closely with victims of crimes and witnessed the toll that violence or other crimes had on them and their families. I often witnessed the hollow feeling that victims experienced following a sentencing and the inadequacy of the system as currently constituted to address their underlying feelings and concerns.
As a criminal defense attorney for 20 years, I have seen the impact of addiction and mental illness on individuals and families. I have also witnessed the massive impact of the filing of criminal charges on a person’s livelihood and ability to provide for his or her family. I have sat with individuals and families who are losing their loved one and breadwinner to incarceration because of a non-violent crime, often being detained due to a lack of financial resources to make bond or because of minor probation violations.
Additionally, I have proudly spent almost 15 years fighting for better wages, healthcare, paid time off and better working conditions through my work as a union labor lawyer. Through my local unions, I represent workers in a wide array of jobs in the private and public sector. To my knowledge, there are not any former Union Labor Lawyers serving as a Judge on the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas.
By combining the intimate experience of working closely with and representing these individuals, I believe I have gained the understanding necessary to make fair rulings that help people and society to improve without unnecessarily damaging a person’s future, whether that be through ruling on a case or sentencing or fashioning a result in a diversionary court. In short, I want the opportunity to improve the system as a whole and for individuals and believe I have the knowledge and ability to do so.
Finally, in addition to the well over one hundred cases I have tried to verdict in the criminal courts, I have provided representation to some degree in every division of the Court of Common Pleas. - Briefly describe something you have done as an attorney that you are especially proud of and why you are proud of that work.
I am very proud of my work in implementing and developing Mental Health Court. I believe that treatment courts such as Mental Health Court were great first steps in looking at the criminal justice system in a different way. I am so proud of the results that focusing on treatment produced in some individuals. The work I did was rewarding because of the transformative results that many of the participants experienced. It also taught me that we should triage many of those who enter the criminal justice system based not on the crimes they are alleged to have committed but rather upon the underlying reasons such as mental health struggles, addiction, poverty, childhood trauma, that brings them to the courts. The offenders should then be treated for those underlying struggles rather than just being processed through and given convictions. - If elected, describe how you would balance the use of restorative justice tools against delivering procedural justice for the victims of crime and ensuring public safety.
The first step in achieving this balance would to be to assess the case to determine whether the case is appropriate for restorative justice. For instance, in a first degree Homicide case or rape case, ensuring public safety and delivering procedural justice are going to be paramount. However, in cases in which the risk to public safety appears limited, the parties, including victims, may obtain a better outcome through restorative justice tools. Mediations and conferences in family law situations or discussions with the parties about treatment as a way to reduce recidivism often yield better results.
For example, in Mental Health Court, we would reach out to all of the people involved in a case to seek treatment for the offender and provide victims with a sense as to why a crime was committed and what can be done to prevent that person from reoffending. - If you are one of the candidates who was recently appointed to the Court of Common Pleas by Gov. Shapiro, and the President Judge has assigned you to a division other than the Family Division, please explain how your professional experience will inform your approach to serving in that Division.
While my experience with the above listed family court matters from a legal standpoint are limited to matters that cross over with other cases that I am handling such as protection from abuse (PFA) matters, criminal cases and estate matters, I do, probably like most people, have the experience of watching close family and friends go through this process.
Also, as a private practitioner who has developed several new practice areas over my years of practice, I am accustomed to delving deeply into a new area of law in a relatively short period of time to become competent and effective in representing clients. I would do the same intensive period of study to become proficient in the law and the forces and interests at play in the family division if so assigned.
Anthony DeLuca – Writing Sample
Other Candidates on the Ballot
Highly Recommended by the Allegheny County Bar Association Judiciary Committee
Julie Capone
Campaign WebsiteJulie Capone
Julie Capone graduated from University of Pittsburgh School of Law in 2001. Passed the Bar in 2001 and has been actively practicing law for the 23 years since then. During her career she has tried approximately 150 to 200 cases.
Julie is an experienced trial attorney, having tried hundreds of cases. She has been an Assistant District Attorney for 23 years and was the first prosecutor assigned to the Elder Abuse Unit, established 20 years ago. Julie implemented victim-sensitive practices, such as pretrial home visits, and deposes seniors offsite when the law permits. She works closely with social service agencies and employs restorative measures, prevention, and outreach. Her passion for senior advocacy began as a teenager, working in a nursing home, and continued through law school, where she participated in a clinic that provided pro bono legal services to low-income seniors.
Julie has been elected to several leadership positions in the Allegheny Bar Association, including chairing its Judiciary Committee. She’s a member of the Academy of Trial Lawyers of Allegheny County and United Steelworkers. Julie is a lifelong Allegheny County resident and was a Democratic Committee Member, until recently resigning to run for judge.
Julie Capone – Questionnaire Response
- Describe your legal experiences in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas including the Civil,Criminal, Family and Orphans Divisions and why these experiences qualify you to be a judge.
I’m an experienced trial attorney and litigator. I currently serve as an Assistant District Attorney in Allegheny County, as I have for the last 23 years, though I’ve recently taken a leave of absence to focus on my campaign. During my tenure in the DA’s Office, I’ve handled hundreds of prosecutions and spent thousands of hours in the courtroom representing and seeking justice for Allegheny County crime victims.
Excluding appeals, I’ve handled all aspects of prosecution. I’ve conducted preliminary hearings, litigated countless suppression and other miscellaneous pre- and post-trial motions, drafted briefs and other legal memorandum, and deposed senior witnesses in court and offsite. I’ve tried hundreds of cases to verdict before judges and juries. In almost all cases I’ve handled, I was the sole prosecutor.
The difference between being a good judge and a great judge is being able to make fair decisions while being compassionate and showing all litigants you realize whatever reason they are in court, their case is their whole world and they will be heard. I’ve had 23 years of on-the-job training for this role and seen how daunting the court process is for all involved, whether a witness, victim, accused, a litigant in a divorce, child custody or a civil proceeding.
It takes not only professional experience, but also personal experience, which I have. I was the victim of a road rage attack in 2009. Prior to this, I thought I was very compassionate and empathetic toward crime victims and others. However, being placed in the center of litigation (a jury trial nonetheless) gave me a new appreciation for victims and litigants.
Lawyers and people who work in the courts may become desensitized to the intimidating nature of court proceedings. We sometimes take it for granted that people will come to court, testify, and do whatever else is necessary to litigate a matter. However, being in court can be a terrifying and traumatic experience. Having gone through that process personally, I think I now have a better understanding of that and am uniquely compassionate about the impact it has on stakeholders and others involved. - Briefly describe something you have done as an attorney that you are especially proud of and why you are proud of that work.
In Elder Abuse cases, it’s my practice to do home visits of senior victims to prepare them for court proceedings. The court system is generally scary, but removing seniors from the confines of their home when they may have mobility issues compounds their anxiety and may present hardships. Going to a person’s home where they feel safe and comfortable, alleviates this extra stress, and I’m proud I’m able to accommodate seniors to help ease tension, which is very important in an already extremely stressful situation. - If elected, describe how you would balance the use of restorative justice tools against delivering procedural justice for the victims of crime and ensuring public safety.
As a prosecutor, I frequently employ restorative justice. Particularly, as an Elder Abuse prosecutor, many of my cases involve allegations that younger household members assault/abuse older ones. I’ve had great success working with social service agencies and Protective Services to provide much needed resources to the victim and accused. In the best cases, both parties can continue living safely and productively together.
My use of restorative justice is not limited to the scenario I mentioned above. I believe restorative justice can be utilized in many cases. But, of course, it’s not appropriate in all cases. Sometimes elements of restorative justice may be appropriate, where other elements are not. As a judge, I would continue using restorative justice and look for even more ways to implement it as an alternative to traditional forms of justice. - If you are one of the candidates who was recently appointed to the Court of Common Pleas by Gov. Shapiro, and the President Judge has assigned you to a division other than the Family Division, please explain how your professional experience will inform your approach to serving in that Division.
I practice exclusively in the Criminal Division. However, I’ve had some limited experience in Orphans’ Court when I was in Pitt Law’s Elder Clinic and more recently when some of my prosecutions were born of Orphans’ Court proceedings, such as probate or guardianship hearings. Notwithstanding my lack of experience in Family Court, I have familiarity with family reunification. Some seniors only have one child or other family members to care for them. When that person abuses or neglects the senior, they have to be separated, which is very traumatic. Of course, separation is a last resort. With the goal of keeping the family members together safely, I’ve collaborated with social service agencies to provide much needed services, training, etc. to both the senior victim and accused.
Based on these experiences, I appreciate the importance and value of family unification. And, like many, I’ve also been a divorce litigant. Being a litigant gives you unique perspective and compassion, as I discussed above. Additionally, my younger brother was adopted, and I have the fondest memories of viewing the pictures of his adoption and the joy my parents had when they felt our family was finally complete. I think these experiences will inform my decision making and make me a better Family Division judge.
If I’m lucky enough to be elected, I would be thrilled to serve in any division, particularly Family Court, because I think you can have a profound and positive effect on families and children. Ultimately being a judge is about public service and having a positive impact on people, and I think I can do that in the Family Division.
Julie Capone – Writing Sample
Dan Miller
Campaign Website
Dan Miller
Dan Miller graduated from Catholic University of America Columbus School of Law in 2002. He passed the Bar in 2002 and practiced for 11 years. During his career, he served as second chair on one attempted homicide trial and tried approximately 100 non-jury adjudication hearings in the Family Division.
Dan was the first person in his family born in this country, and that means something to him. Dan has always pursued public service, whether in the Army National Guard, AmeriCorps, the fire department, or as a legislator in Harrisburg. Dan became a lawyer because he believed that our American constitution and jurisprudence changed the world and provided a platform of opportunity for all. Dan has always maintained that when our laws are written correctly, there is equality. If the law is practiced correctly, there’s opportunity. When administered fairly, there is justice.
Dan Miller – Questionnaire Response
- Describe your legal experiences in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas including the Civil,Criminal, Family and Orphans Divisions and why these experiences qualify you to be a judge.
I spent 11 years as a public defender and county solicitor before being elected to the legislature. During that period I was in court 3-4x a week making thousands of court appearances. This included representing clients in criminal and orphan’s proceedings, but the overwhelming majority of my work was in the Family Division. There are no jury trials in Family Division, so this meant that both as a PD and a solicitor our adjudicatory phase was always similar to a criminal court bench trial. In essence, I defended delinquency matters and prosecuted dependency cases. As a special education attorney I have also represented clients that have picked up cases in delinquency while we were working to address the shortcomings of their IEPs. While serving 11 years in the legislature I have written countless bills and amendments that address all divisions of the court, specializing in the intersection of disability and mental health and the courts and juvenile justice. I believe that my unique experience as an attorney and a legislator gives me practical courtroom experience combined with a deep understanding of legislative intent to apply the law effectively and fairly. - Briefly describe something you have done as an attorney that you are especially proud of and why you are proud of that work.
I am proud that I have spent my entire career working for people who are indigent, helping kids, and making sure that constitutional rights are protected (especially in relation to disability and mental health issues). As the eldest child of immigrant parents raised on food stamps and government assistance, I am proud to have taken advantage of the opportunity my mother fought for me to have, and then to not forget where I came from in the process. I know that my legal work and public service made her proud and that continues to mean a lot to me. - If elected, describe how you would balance the use of restorative justice tools against delivering procedural justice for the victims of crime and ensuring public safety.
As a public defender I argued for restorative justice adoption in every aspect of my cases, but most assuredly when I represented kids. Restorative justice when administered effectively allows for a deeper reconciliation of the issues that brought people to court in the first place. It breaks down silos and attempts to build bridges based on shared community values. It attempts to end negative cycles and increase the likelihood of both individual and community success. Cases should be viewed through this lens as much as possible. - If you are one of the candidates who was recently appointed to the Court of Common Pleas by Gov. Shapiro, and the President Judge has assigned you to a division other than the Family Division, please explain how your professional experience will inform your approach to serving in that Division.
I hope to be assigned as judge to the Family Division as it is where I have made thousands of court appearances. I actually turned down other assignments to get into Family. As a former public school teacher, I have always enjoyed working with kids, and as an attorney I thought it was where I could have the greatest impact. Family reunification was a priority issue for me when I was a county solicitor, and this included structuring visitation arrangements that were often extremely varied and complex. As a child who was raised in a home impacted by domestic violence and a painful divorce, I know personally how these issues can have lasting effects on kids and participants for years to come. That’s why I sincerely believe that Family Division is where a difference can be made, case-by-case, family-by-family, in a way that hopefully limits trauma and builds futures.
Dan Miller – Writing Sample
Jackie Obara
Campaign Website
Jackie Obara
Jackie Obara graduated from Duquesne University School of Law in 2004. She has been working as an attorney since 2004. During that period she worked as a trial attorney for two years, since 2006 she has served as a judicial clerk for a judge at the Court of Common Pleas. Since 2019 she has served as a Divorce Hearings Officer presiding over divorce hearings.
Since graduating from law school, Jackie has been a litigator, the Judicial Law Clerk to Hon. Tom Flaherty, a Divorce Hearing Officer, and an Adjunct Professor of Trial Advocacy. While she has experience in all divisions of the Court of Common Pleas, Jackie has dedicated the vast majority of her practice to Family Law. During the past 5+ years, through Jackie’s service as a Divorce Hearing Officer, she has had daily involvement with parties and counsel regarding economic claims incident to divorce and complex support.
Jackie is running for Judge with the hope of serving in the Family Division so as to provide continuity on the bench and expand her service to the families of Allegheny County. Jackie lives in Elizabeth Township with her husband David, an Assistant Public Defender since 1998, and their three children.
Jackie Obara – Questionnaire Response
- Describe your legal experiences in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas including the Civil,Criminal, Family and Orphans Divisions and why these experiences qualify you to be a judge.
My primary area of practice for the past 20 years has been Family Law, but I have experience in Criminal Division as a Judicial Law Clerk to the Honorable Judge Tom Flaherty and have litigated a few matters in Civil Division and Orphan’s Court.
With respect to Family Division, I have litigated custody, support, divorce, protection from abuse, dependency, and appellate matters on behalf of clients. I served as Judge Flaherty’s Law Clerk while he was assigned to the Family Division and was appointed as a Discovery Master for complex divorce cases. For the past 5 ½ years, I have been a Divorce Hearing Officer where I preside over hearings and conciliations related to economic claims incident to divorce, complex support, and other related matters.
This experience qualifies me to be a judge because I have had the ability to work in all aspects of the court system; I have proven that I can learn and apply any body of law that is required; and I have developed the temperament of a good judge. - Briefly describe something you have done as an attorney that you are especially proud of and why you are proud of that work.
I am the most proud of my work as a Divorce Hearing Officer. In that capacity, I have had a direct impact on over 1,000 families. I ensured that each case was heard in a fair and impartial manner and that each litigant was treated with dignity and compassion. Perhaps most importantly, I had the ability to review the law and apply it in novel ways to ensure an equitable outcome. - If elected, describe how you would balance the use of restorative justice tools against delivering procedural justice for the victims of crime and ensuring public safety.
Restorative justice refers to the concept that the criminal justice system should focus on repairing harm by promoting individual accountability and addressing the underlying reason for the harm rather than imposing punishment. It is a collaborative process with all participants: victims, communities, and wrongdoers. Restoration can be incorporated into the criminal justice system by incorporating rehabilitation and social services into the bail process; establishing and expanding Common Pleas Court level pretrial diversionary programs; and applying individualized sentencing considerations. - If you are one of the candidates who was recently appointed to the Court of Common Pleas by Gov. Shapiro, and the President Judge has assigned you to a division other than the Family Division, please explain how your professional experience will inform your approach to serving in that Division.
For the past twenty (20) years, I have focused my career on practicing all aspects of Family Law. First, as a litigator, then as a Judicial Law Clerk, and, finally, as a Divorce Hearing Officer. My approach has always been to treat all litigants with dignity and respect, hear each case in a fair and impartial manner, and ensure an equitable outcome. As such, it is my desire to be assigned to the Family Division, and welcome the opportunity to do so.
Jackie Obara – Writing Sample
Michele Santicola
Campaign Website
Michele Santicola
Michele Santicola graduated from Penn State Dickinson Law in 2002. She passed the Bar in 2002 and has practiced as a trial attorney for 20 years. During her career she has tried over 80 cases, of those 20 were jury trials.
Michele started her career as a Deputy Attorney General, representing the Commonwealth in 22 counties in pleas, sentencings, trials, Grand Jury cases and appeals. Michele went into private practice, representing defendants in criminal and civil cases. She has served as a Hearing Examiner for the LCB, sitting as fact finder and ruling on issues of evidence and credibility. Michele wrote lengthy, in depth opinions supporting my findings of fact and conclusions of law. She has served on the Moon Township Board of Supervisors, overseeing a 16 million budget, negotiating contracts and helping bring development to the area. Michele currently serves as a Magisterial District Judge. She has presided over thousands of cases – criminal, civil, truancy, traffic and emergency protection from abuse orders. Michele is the Vice Chair of the Supreme Court Criminal Rules Committee.
Michele Santicola – Questionnaire Response
- Describe your legal experiences in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas including the Civil,Criminal, Family and Orphans Divisions and why these experiences qualify you to be a judge.
I have been an attorney for thirty years. I started my career as a Deputy Attorney General, and spent ten years in that role. I handled bench and jury trials, pleadings, motions, pleas, sentencings and appeals in Courts of Common Pleas in 23 counties in Western Pennsylvania. I also handled many cases in the Statewide Investigating Grand Jury. After 10 years, I went into private practice and mainly represented defendants in criminal cases and although I tried cases in other counties, most of my experience as a defense attorney was in Allegheny County. I have stood with the guilty and the innocent, and those experiences shaped my life. I believe seeing both sides – first as a prosecutor, then as a defense attorney – educated me more than law school. It made me appreciate that a defendant in a case is so much more than his/her/their charges. Next, I became a Hearing Examiner for the Liquor Control Board. In that quasi-judicial role, I presided over cases involving liquor licensing issues, including license transfers, tax issues and nuisance bars. My most notable opinion granted convenience stores the ability to sell alcohol, a first in Pennsylvania.
I have been a Magisterial District Judge for the past 5 years, and in that role, I have presided over thousands of cases. Exactly like a Common Pleas Judge, a Magisterial District Judge rules on admissibility of evidence, determines credibility of witnesses, evaluates whether or not parties have met their burdens of proof and runs a courtroom. Based on my experience, my peers in the Bar Association have rated me HIGHLY RECOMMENDED - Briefly describe something you have done as an attorney that you are especially proud of and why you are proud of that work.
The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania appointed me to the Criminal Rules Committee in 2005. The Committee is made up of judges and attorneys from around the Commonwealth. We meet several times a year for days long meetings during which we write, rewrite and revise the Rules of Criminal Procedure that govern the practice of Criminal Law in Pennsylvania. It is an honor to serve on this committee, and the work we do is important and impactful. The Attorney General was on the Committee when I joined, and I often say I have learned more from my peers on the Committee than I did in law school. We debate the most important issues, and I love hearing all sides of a problem being discussed. During my tenure, we have tackled hearsay rules and bond reform, two of the biggest issues in the practice of criminal law. After four years of service on the Committee, the Court recently elevated me to Vice Chair as a result of their confidence in my abilities. This service and honor have been a highlight of my career.
I am also proud of my experience. I am the only candidate who has been a prosecutor, a defense attorney and a judge. - If elected, describe how you would balance the use of restorative justice tools against delivering procedural justice for the victims of crime and ensuring public safety.
This balancing act is one I perform daily as a Magisterial District Judge. I learned early in my tenure on the bench that the vast majority of crimes stem from mental health and/or addiction problems. We can not punish away the problems. Not only is punishment an ineffective solution to these issues, it is an unfair one. Our resources are not unlimited (far from it), so it’s crucial that we spend them wisely. It is better to spend money helping to rehabilitate those who can be helped than to house them in jail. It’s also better in the long run, because our ultimate goal is to get people out of the system and back to being productive members of society. This method is neither foolproof nor easy. It also often doesn’t work on the first try; however, it is important to put our efforts here. Society as a whole is better for it. That said, I have also presided over cases where punishment is necessary both for the victims and to prevent further crimes. I have presided over many homicide preliminary hearings at the Pittsburgh Municipal Court Building. I have presided over child rape cases and repeated sales of heroin and fentanyl. In certain cases, the public and/or particular victims can only be made safe by sequestering the perpetrator. - If you are one of the candidates who was recently appointed to the Court of Common Pleas by Gov. Shapiro, and the President Judge has assigned you to a division other than the Family Division, please explain how your professional experience will inform your approach to serving in that Division.
I have handled hundreds of Protection From Abuse petitions, and that experience will serve me well if I am fortunate enough to be elected and end up in the Family Division. I have also dealt with many family disputes among divorced parents in truancy cases. I have learned to navigate these waters and constantly remind parents of the same adage that applies to all family law cases – act in the best interest of the child. Another great advantage I will have is being used to pro se litigants. Many cases in the Family Division involve pro se litigants. As a Magisterial District Judge, many of my cases involve pro se litigants. Any judge will tell you that presiding over cases with pro se litigants is difficult. It is critical to balance giving them their day in court with not “lawyering” for them. Often emotions run high, and a judge must keep the temperature down. Although I have not practiced family law, I believe that based upon my temperament, skill set and legal experience, I can serve in that role and do it well. As I tell my children, everyone has a first day at something. Work hard, and you can become great at it. I promise to work hard.
Michele Santicola – Writing Sample
Craig S. Stephens
Campaign Website
Craig Stephens
Craig Stephens graduated from Duquesne University Kline School of Law in 1993. Craig practiced law from 1995-2015 as a trial attorney in various roles. He has served as a magistrate since 2015 presiding in over 50,000 cases.
Craig’s extensive experience and unwavering commitment to justice have left a lasting impact on the communities he serves. Beyond the courtroom, Craig is deeply involved in his community, volunteering his time and expertise to various non-profit and charitable organizations. His dedication to service, both professionally and personally, exemplifies his mission to improve lives and uphold the principles of justice in Allegheny County.
Craig Stephens – Questionnaire Response
- Describe your legal experiences in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas including the Civil,Criminal, Family and Orphans Divisions and why these experiences qualify you to be a judge.
In the Family Division, I worked as an Assistant County Solicitor in the CYF Unit, where I handled cases involving child welfare, neglect, and abuse. I fought to protect vulnerable children and ensure that families received the resources and support they needed. In the Orphans’ Court Division, I served as a Solicitor in the Mental Health Unit, where I handled cases related to involuntary commitments, mental health care, and emergency protection hearings.
My work in the Criminal Division has given me firsthand knowledge of how the justice system impacts individuals and communities. As a Magisterial District Judge, I have presided over tens of thousands of cases, including preliminary hearings, arraignments, and search warrant applications.
In the Civil Division, I have worked on cases involving landlord-tenant disputes, contract issues, traffic violations and many more. These cases have given me valuable insight into the challenges that individuals and businesses face when navigating the legal system.
This diverse experience has prepared me to serve as a fair, knowledgeable, and compassionate judge in the Court of Common Pleas. I have dedicated my career to justice, and I am ready to bring my experience, integrity, and commitment to the bench.
In this capacity, I am responsible for overseeing prosecutors, assigned to the section, who are responsible for the investigation and prosecution of criminal offenses varying from criminal homicide to public corruption cases. I also personally handle and supervise Grand Jury Investigations. I have 26 years of trial court experience which would qualify me to serve as judge. I have handled both filed cases and those in the investigative stage. I have had multiple jury trials and non jury trials. I have filed and argued motions before the court. I have analyzed evidence thoroughly, weighed evidence objectively and made informed decisions based on my evaluation. I have the disposition and temperament that is necessary for a judge. I understand the law and courtroom procedures. - Briefly describe something you have done as an attorney that you are especially proud of and why you are proud of that work.
A cause that I have grown more invested in as I have learned about it is the homelessness crisis in our city, and in our country. Throughout my life, I have learned about the plethora of reasons for homelessness, like the rising cost of housing outpaces wages in many areas, and a shortage of affordable rental units particularly impacts low-income families and individuals, forcing many into homelessness. Also knowing that Black, Indigenous, and People of Color, as well as the LGBTQ communities are disproportionately represented in the homeless population due to historical and systemic inequities in housing has motivated me to advocate for the most at risk in our society. - If elected, describe how you would balance the use of restorative justice tools against delivering procedural justice for the victims of crime and ensuring public safety.
As someone dedicated to fairness and equity, I believe restorative justice is a powerful approach to creating meaningful change within our legal system. Restorative justice shifts the focus from punishment to healing, emphasizing accountability, community involvement, and repairing harm. This approach aligns with my commitment to addressing the root causes of harm and fostering understanding between all parties involved.
In my work, whether advocating for children in the CYF Unit or navigating complex ethical issues, I have seen the transformative power of engaging people in dialogue and finding resolutions that prioritize relationships and well-being. Restorative justice seeks to meet the needs of victims, hold offenders accountable in constructive ways, and strengthen communities by addressing systemic issues that contribute to harm. As a judge, I will champion restorative practices that create opportunities for personal growth, rebuild trust, and ensure justice is not just delivered but truly felt by all involved. - If you are one of the candidates who was recently appointed to the Court of Common Pleas by Gov. Shapiro, and the President Judge has assigned you to a division other than the Family Division, please explain how your professional experience will inform your approach to serving in that Division.
Craig Stephens – Writing Sample
While conducting preliminary arraignments and at preliminary hearings, I have reduced cash bail in many cases. For example, I typically impose a nominal cash bail where the defendant is being detained on a probation or parole matter and cannot be released at that time, in order that they receive credit for the time they are incarcerated. Bail should not be used as a form of punishment, but a tool for keeping the community safe and ensuring that individuals appear for all court hearings. If there are no combination of conditions that can ensure safety of the community or the victims, then bail is typically denied. The reason I do not impose high cash bail is because it often results in a constructive denial of bail. When bail is denied, individuals have an automatic bail review hearing within 72 hours before a Judge in the Court of Common Pleas. After a bail review hearing, a Common Pleas Judge has the ability to release the individual to a less restrictive setting such as electronic home monitoring, whereas Magisterial Judges cannot order electronic home monitoring. Bail is reviewed on a case by case basis, balancing keeping the community safe and making sure individuals who do not have the means to post bail are not unjustly detained.
Hilary Wheatley
Campaign Website
Hilary Wheatley
Hilary Wheatley graduated from the Penn State Dickinson Law in 2002 and passed the Pennsylvania bar in 2002 and the Ohio bar in 2005. Hilary has practiced law since 2002 and worked as a trial attorney from 2003 until she began serving as a magistrate judge in 2022. While most of her cases settled out of court, she tried approximately 5 jury trials, dozens of non-jury trials and more than 1,000 mandatory arbitrations. She has presided over thousands of hearings in magisterial district courts.
After clerking in the York County Court of Common Pleas, she represented consumers for four years in unfair trade practice and Lemon Law cases. Since 2007, Hilary has concentrated on real estate litigation and transactions with Papernick & Gefsky. She has extensive jury and non-jury trial experience, has argued cases before federal appellate courts, and has frequently been appointed to serve as an arbitrator and mediator.
Hilary resides in Mt. Lebanon with her 13 year-old son and their dog, Quinn.
Hilary Wheatley – Questionnaire Response
- Describe your legal experiences in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas including the Civil,Criminal, Family and Orphans Divisions and why these experiences qualify you to be a judge.
I have twenty years of civil trial experience in Allegheny County and in many other Pennsylvania counties. I have tried dozens of non-jury and jury trials and have argued hundreds of motions and petitions before Civil Division Judges. I was also regularly appointed to serve on civil and landlord-tenant arbitration panels and as a mediator and pro bono attorney for Allegheny County’s Housing Court. I have represented clients in estate and trust administration and will contests in the Orphans Division.
While I have no experience representing clients as an attorney in either Family or Criminal Division cases, as a Magisterial District Judge, I preside over Preliminary Arraignments and Preliminary Hearings in criminal cases, and over trials for summary criminal charges, traffic citations, building code violations, and truancy; civil claims with an amount in controversy of $12,000 or less; and residential and commercial landlord-tenant disputes. I also review applications for search warrants and arrest warrants and hear Petitions for Emergency Protection from Abuse (PFA) Orders.
In the past three years as a Magisterial District Judge, I have set bail for more than 1,000 defendants charged with felonies or misdemeanors, presided over more than 1,000 Preliminary Hearings, including more than two dozen cases involving homicide charges, and over thousands of other hearings in my courtroom. I have considered dozens of Petitions for Emergency Protection from Abuse Orders and hundreds of requests for search and arrest warrants.
I am qualified to be a judge on the Court of Common Pleas because I have spent the last three years doing the work of a judge. I evaluate witness credibility, determine the admissibility of evidence, rule on motions and objections, and issue rulings that I know will be consequential to the lives of the people before me. I manage a courtroom, a docket, and staff, while ensuring that the rights of the parties are honored, that people are given an opportunity to be heard, and that my rulings are fair and impartial. I have conducted myself in compliance with the Code of Judicial Conduct and have done my part, as a member of the judicial branch, to be a check on the powers of the legislative and executive branches of our government. - Briefly describe something you have done as an attorney that you are especially proud of and why you are proud of that work.
In December 2024 and early January 2025, I volunteered at two pro bono legal clinics for the LGBTQ+ community. These clinics were organized and offered in reaction to the November 2024 election results, by the Hugh Lane Wellness Foundation, during a time when so many were wondering what their lives and rights might look like under the incoming presidential administration. It was an honor to use my legal experience and skills to be a helper, by walking clients through such deeply personal matters as documenting their estate plans or starting the process to have their legal name reflect their identity. - If elected, describe how you would balance the use of restorative justice tools against delivering procedural justice for the victims of crime and ensuring public safety.
As a Magisterial District Judge, I am grateful to have restorative justice tools in my toolbox. But, over the past three years, I have learned that not all cases are appropriate for the use of those tools–some crimes are too violent or involve such an imbalance of power between the offender and victim, some victims will not consent, or some offenders will not engage. It is important for judges to have the experience to be able to discern the difference and to use restorative justice tools only when appropriate for the victim, offender, and community.
As an elected MDJ, I have had numerous opportunities to use restorative justice tools in my courtroom. When considering whether to use restorative justice tools, I assess the nature of the crime, the willingness of the offender to take responsibility and engage in the process genuinely, the consent of the victim, and the potential impact on public safety. Restorative justice must also provide procedural fairness–the proceeding and process must be transparent and give all stakeholders an opportunity to be heard. When implemented properly, I have seen restorative justice provide accountability for the victim, the offender and the community, without compromising public safety or being “soft on crime”. I would continue these practices if elected to the Court of Common Pleas. - If you are one of the candidates who was recently appointed to the Court of Common Pleas by Gov. Shapiro, and the President Judge has assigned you to a division other than the Family Division, please explain how your professional experience will inform your approach to serving in that Division.
I will approach service in the Family Division like I would approach service in any other division, which is also how I approached my legal career: with a dedication to learning the law and procedures applicable to each case, leaning on more experienced colleagues as necessary, and being thoroughly prepared. That is how I have approached my role as a Magisterial District Judge, whether for cases in my area of legal practice or for cases that were outside the scope of my expertise. As a judge, I know that the parties, the lawyers, and the community rely on me to be prepared, to preside neutrally and impartially, to know the relevant legal procedures and principles, and then to apply the facts to the law. I do not take that responsibility lightly.
Over the course of my two decades as a practicing attorney, many of my cases involved novel legal arguments or new areas of the law. I tackled each of those cases the same way that I approach a novel proceeding or case assigned to me as a Magisterial District Judge: with research and thorough preparation. That is what I have done for the past three years and what I will continue to do as a judge in the Court of Common Pleas, whether it is a complex divorce action, a preliminary hearing involving serious felony charges, a juvenile dependency hearing, or a serious personal injury claim.
Hilary Wheatley – Writing Sample
Recommended by the Allegheny County Bar Association Judiciary Committee
Elizabeth Hughes
Campaign Website
Elizabeth Hughes
Elizabeth Hughes graduated from University of Pittsburgh Law School in 2004 and passed the bar in 2005. She has been practicing law since then and practiced as a trial attorney for eleven years. Elizabeth has tried between 12-15 cases. The primary area of her practice pertained to family law and mental health and neither division has jury trials. Elizabeth has represented Allegheny County in thousands of involuntary commitment hearings and adjudicated many complex hearings in the Family Division and Orphans’ Court Division.
Elizabeth is a practical problem solver who believes in common sense for the Court of Common Pleas. Elizabeth brings 20 years of legal experience across all Divisions, with 10 years practicing family law. As an Assistant Solicitor, she focused on mental health law, handling thousands of involuntary commitment hearings and represented the County in guardianship proceedings.
Passionate about serving children and families, Elizabeth is currently a health law attorney, focusing on pediatric and women’s health. Elizabeth also successfully led the Allegheny County Bar Association through the Covid-19 pandemic as its President. She is a proud native of Penn Hills.
Elizabeth Hughes – Questionnaire Response
- Describe your legal experiences in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas including the Civil,Criminal, Family and Orphans Divisions and why these experiences qualify you to be a judge.
I have 20 years of legal experience in government, private and health law practice and have practiced in every division in the Court of Common Pleas. I additionally served as a clerk for the Honorable Justin M. Johnson in the Superior Court of Pennsylvania. My experience includes over ten years in private practice litigating in the Family Division, both the adult and juvenile side, which makes me uniquely qualified to be prepared to serve on day one, as most newly elected judges begin their tenure here. However, my diverse legal background has prepared me to serve in any division in which I would be called upon to do so.
I currently serve as primary counsel for UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh, UPMC Mercy and UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital. Additionally, I am the primary counsel for over 60 pediatric outpatient offices and the lead counsel for UPMC’s pediatric service line, providing legal guidance to all entities on issues related to the care of patients ages birth to 18. As counsel for Children’s, I work daily with our Child Advocacy Center on behalf of abused and neglected children, engaging regularly with county Children Youth & Families (CYF), KidsVoice, current Family Division judges, district attorneys, and private counsel to find smart, logical solutions to problems to better serve the children and families of Allegheny County. I also oversee outside counsel representing UPMC in various litigation.
While most of my recent practice has focused on family law and health law, I also have experience in criminal court experience including representing clients in misdemeanor cases, expungements, and juvenile delinquency matters and in civil court handling personal injury and toxic tort matters. I have significant experience in Orphans’ Court through my work as an Assistant Solicitor for Allegheny County. In that capacity I handled thousands of involuntary commitment hearings and represented the County in guardianship hearings.
These experiences are essential in making me highly qualified to serve the people of Allegheny County on the bench. We all wish for more and unlimited resources to serve the litigants who appear before the Court and to assist the Court in its resolution or progression of cases. However, this is often not the case, and the litigants, counsel and Judges are often constrained to work within the confines of what is available. Because I have experience across all areas of practice, I am uniquely positioned to identify the key stakeholders to bring to the table when trying to practically solve problems, increase efficiency in the Courts, and resolve cases with a common sense approach for the Common Pleas. - Briefly describe something you have done as an attorney that you are especially proud of and why you are proud of that work.
I am especially proud of the service I provided to my colleagues and the community as the112th President of the Allegheny County Bar Association (ACBA). I was unwittingly shouldered with the responsibility of serving in this role during the Covid-19 pandemic. I served from July 2020 to June 2021. We were fully remote and the ACBA had to make difficult decisions regarding operations, finances and personnel. I was able to lead the organization as a practical problem solver, not only by insisting on transparency with our membership, being collaborative with the Board and hearing varied ideas and viewpoints, but also by being decisive when necessary and not being afraid to make difficult decisions for the benefit of the organization and the membership. We emerged from the pandemic financially in the black, without staff layoffs, and having completed some significant projects and initiatives. We maintained engagement and levels of membership, quickly pivoted to remote programming and meetings, and I adapted how I communicated to the membership to keep them informed with town hall meetings and video recaps of our Board of Governors meetings.
I also rose to the occasion of our mission to educate the public and developed a series of videos to educate the public on how to vote by mail starring our members as volunteers. I encouraged collaboration to work within the confines of what we had available to get things done and still make progress. This experience through unknown adversity made me confident that I have the necessary ability to listen to diverse perspectives and hear what people are saying and sharing but to also know when tough decisions must be made to move forward. I believe that the unique perspective and skills that I gained from my tenure would translate seamlessly to the bench. - If elected, describe how you would balance the use of restorative justice tools against delivering procedural justice for the victims of crime and ensuring public safety.
Restorative justice can empower victims of crime and work to help reintegrate and rehabilitate offenders rather than simply create a punitive result. It can help to bring closure to the victim and provide insight to the offender as to the effects of their actions on others. Restorative practices can be a valuable tool for the courts on a case-by-case basis but may not always be appropriate to address certain crimes. These practices could be particularly effective in certain instances, for example in certain cases involving drug offenses, and I believe the use of restorative justice should be given particular consideration in cases involving juveniles whenever possible.
I believe that programs that focus on restorative justice and provide opportunities for youth to receive the significant supports they need from a “wrap-around” perspective can be the most effective. The most effective diversion should start with a thorough evaluation to assess the child’s needs and then implementing services that best serve that child. Making this a success, however, takes input and collaboration from all stakeholders. The investment in diversion must be wholesale on all fronts, not only from the youth, but from the prosecutors, law enforcement, family and community supports, and the judge. The diversion track must be realistically explored, even when it seems like it is the more difficult path logistically. Minors should not be placed on the trajectory to being adjudicated delinquent simply because it is convenient. I believe that judges should use alternative placements as a last resort and attempt to focus on restorative or rehabilitative practices whenever possible and when the child is not posing a safety risk to others. Utilizing my background in mental health to facilitate a trauma-informed courtroom is of paramount importance. Identifying the root causes of behaviors and providing mental health support, along with other resources should be the priority. When that is not possible and placement is necessary, the focus should remain on rehabilitation and moving youth out of the cycle of the criminal justice system. - If you are one of the candidates who was recently appointed to the Court of Common Pleas by Gov. Shapiro, and the President Judge has assigned you to a division other than the Family Division, please explain how your professional experience will inform your approach to serving in that Division.
I have over ten years of experience practicing in Family Division and have practiced on both the adult side (custody, divorce, support, equitable distribution, etc.) and the juvenile side (dependency and delinquency). I have extensive experience, including trial experience, in all areas of family law. I have litigated custody actions to trial, as well as litigated custody actions involving complex matters of jurisdiction, relocation, allegations of abuse, issues of standing, court ordered psychological evaluations, cases where one or both parties are ordered to undergo drug testing and/or treatment, mental health evaluations, cases where co-parenting counseling or reunification counseling has been ordered, contempt hearings, partial custody hearings, etc. I have also litigated divorce actions, support actions, including actions in spousal support, alimony and child support, including support actions that are deemed complex, and claims for equitable distribution. I have also represented clients in Protection from Abuse matters and continue to do so pro bono. I have appeared before judges in motions court in family division probably thousands of times and conciliated cases before judges, as well as appeared for hearings numbering in at least the hundreds if not more. I have represented parents in juvenile court in dependency actions and represented juvenile clients in delinquency court. I currently regularly advise our physicians who testify in family court cases as witnesses for CYF in juvenile court matters regarding allegations of abuse. I also was an adjunct professor for the Civil & Family Justice Clinic at Duquesne Law School and supervised law students in motions court as they represented pro se clients.
Having served in the Family Division while new judges have commenced their duties on numerous occasions, I recognize the critical importance of possessing a background and comprehensive understanding of family law and its intricacies for managing these cases. The issues are not only complex, but emotions run high in the Family Division as the matters being litigated are deeply personal and carry significant stakes for the individuals appearing before the Court. It is crucial that judges entering this division are at least somewhat acquainted with the legal issues they will encounter. Additionally, they must be capable of setting the appropriate tone in the courtroom for the litigants as well as for the attorneys appearing before them. I believe that I have not only the experience, but the temperament necessary to serve and have been able to work collaboratively over the years to mediate and solve problems to come to effective resolutions that work for all parties involved. Communication and collaboration are often the first steps to solving problems. This is true when considering available resources and options for settlement and for mediating issues between parties, as this is also the role of a judge. It is important to be able to hear a case to finality if it must be litigated to trial, however, the mediation skills of a great jurist cannot be understated for not only the efficiency of the courts, but also often for the betterment of the parties in the long run.
Elizabeth Hughes – Writing Sample
Matthew V. Rudzki
Campaign Website
Matthew V. Rudzki
Matthew Rudzki graduated from Duquesne School of Law in 2013. Passed the Bar in 2013 and has been actively practicing law for 12 years since then. Matthew has never worked as a trial attorney and has not tried any cases. Since being elected as a magistrate judge he has presided over more than 15,000 hearings.
Matthew currently serves the Fox Chapel Area communities as district judge, and previously served Sharpsburg as mayor, councilman, and Democratic chair. Since taking the bench, Matthew has presided over many cases, and volunteers to hear homicide preliminary hearings and other matters at Pittsburgh Municipal Court. Adhering to the principles of restorative, fair, and accessible justice, Matthew utilizes a wide array of diversionary programs in his court, limits his use of monetary bond, hosts night court for juvenile matters and working folks, and uses trained therapy dogs in his waiting room.
Matthew Rudzki – Questionnaire Response
- Describe your legal experiences in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas including the Civil,Criminal, Family and Orphans Divisions and why these experiences qualify you to be a judge.
Before taking the bench in 2022, the bulk of my practice was within the Civil and Orphans Divisions, with appearances in the Criminal Division, and with limited practice in the Family Division. I appeared in motions court, status conferences, pleas, and before administrative bodies such as the Board of Property Assessment Appeals, the Board of Viewers, and Sheriff’s Sales. My time spent before judges and hearing officers exposed me to a wide array of judicial approaches and temperaments, all of which has had an impact on how I approach my role as a district judge and helped me develop a judicial temperament that is calm, patient, respectful, courteous, and dignified.
Beyond my time in private practice, I am in my fourth year as the district judge for the Fox Chapel Area. In that time, I have handled over 15,000 cases in my district court, including: civil matters, criminal matters, traffic & non traffic matters, landlord-tenant matters, bail hearings & preliminary arraignments, emergency protection from abuse order hearings, reviewing and approving or denying warrants, and officiating weddings. In addition, I am one of the few judges who volunteers to sit for homicide preliminary hearings at Pittsburgh Municipal Court, cover for my colleagues in their district courts, and preside over matters at Pittsburgh Municipal Court. On a near-daily basis, I am holding dozens of summary trials and preliminary hearings, ruling on objections and making evidentiary decisions, crafting solutions to matters to the benefit of all parties involved, and issuing judgments or verdicts.
Because of my time on the bench, I have the necessary experience and proven judicial temperament to take with me to the Court of Common Pleas. Further, I know the tools judges have available to them and would like to take the meaningful and effective progress I have made locally and apply it to a County-wide scale to deliver justice-oriented outcomes for all the residents of Allegheny County as a judge of the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas. - Briefly describe something you have done as an attorney that you are especially proud of and why you are proud of that work.
As a lawyer magisterial district judge (16/46 in the County), I am particularly proud of what we have accomplished in my district court. Regularly, defendants in criminal matters come to my court. Generally, some form of unmet mental health needs, substance use disorder, or a combination of both is the root cause of the underlying alleged criminal behavior. While I was Sharpsburg’s mayor, I advocated for an embedded social worker in the police department, and Borough Council hired a social worker after I took the bench. The Sharpsburg Police Social Worker and a social worker from Passages to Recovery are always in my courtroom for the criminal court session and are able to connect and follow up with defendants ordered to complete treatment. Having them present has increased our successful outcomes with folks completing treatment and their cases being withdrawn, dismissed, or reduced at the preliminary hearing, allowing them to maintain their job, their job, stay on their feet, or get back on their feet.
Recognizing the detrimental impact of cash bail and in addressing the disparity caused by the use of it, I rarely use monetary bond except in limited circumstances—if a defendant has a detainer or a hold. However, I will hold defendants without bond if I determine that no conditions can guarantee the safety of the public or there is a flight risk. The reasons are many, but primarily: nobody should sit in jail because they are too poor and conversely, if someone can afford to post bond it does not necessarily make our communities any safer, nor does it guarantee their appearance.
When I took the bench, I became the second judge in the County to introduce a night court option for juvenile and school cases, and also have trained therapy dogs in the court waiting room. As a former teacher, I know that students belong in the classroom and it always seemed counterproductive to me that we pulled students out of the classroom to talk about truancy. Thus, on the first Thursday of the month we start high school cases at 3:30, middle- and elementary school cases at 4:30, and reserve time for working folks and families to hold landlord-tenant and traffic matters so that they do not have to take off a day of work and lose a day’s wages to come to court. - If elected, describe how you would balance the use of restorative justice tools against delivering procedural justice for the victims of crime and ensuring public safety.
The issues do not have to be mutually exclusive and in my time on the bench, I believe I have struck a balance between the two.
Restorative justice is a platform of my campaign. It requires taking a holistic approach to the matter at hand, whether it be making a plaintiff whole in a civil matter, delivering meaningful diversionary programs to a defendant in a criminal matter, utilizing Act 162 of 2023 and fine & fee workshops to help folks get warrants lifted, their license restored, their job back, their housing situation stabilized, and their life back, or crafting creative solutions for at-risk youth. Judges have many tools available to them to help resolve matters in their court, and as noted above in my time as a jurist, I have learned what those tools are and how to meaningfully and effectively use them.
With this in mind, I take my role as a sitting jurist very seriously. Judges are robed in immense powers. In my fourth year on the bench, I am well aware that most folks who enter a courtroom want procedural justice, even if the outcome may not be what they had hoped. Procedural justice takes many forms: an impartial judge who avoids the appearance of impropriety, a judge who treats parties before the court with dignity and respect, a judge who makes clear their decisions and the rationale behind them, and most importantly a judge who allows all parties the opportunity to be heard
Every day I am on the bench, I adhere to the above principles so that justice can be restorative, which should be the ultimate goal, while also respecting the need for procedural justice. - If you are one of the candidates who was recently appointed to the Court of Common Pleas by Gov. Shapiro, and the President Judge has assigned you to a division other than the Family Division, please explain how your professional experience will inform your approach to serving in that Division.
I will approach service in Family Division as I do my role as district judge: to deliver meaningful and effective results to the parties with dignity, courtesy, and respect.
While my practice in the Family Division was limited, as a district judge I handle, on average, 40 juvenile cases per month in my district court during my night court session. It is important to note that the Family Division is further separated in an adult section and a juvenile section.
Entering my fourth year on the bench, my night court session has always been the most rewarding day in court but also the most exhausting, but it is because I endlessly try to craft creative solutions to resolve matters before me. All of the students who come before me are so full of potential, but some are totally lacking in resources or services in the home. Truancy, as a result of the pandemic, has only continued to get worse and the amount of vaping/dabbing in our schools is shocking. During my night court session, I generally always have a representative from the Allegheny County Department of Human Services present to help families connect to resources. However, for every success story that makes me smile from ear to ear, there are also students with whom neither the schools nor I can breakthrough. I am always willing learn about and use best practices in my courtroom, especially for some of our most vulnerable, particularly when it comes to addressing truancy, vaping/dabbing, drinking in school, fighting in school, or stealing in school.
District judges are on the front lines of domestic violence cases and also handle emergency protection from abuse petitions. Through this process, we tangentially deal with separation or divorce matters, as well as custody issues, and I have become very familiar with the process for both issues.
Matthew Rudzki – Writing Sample
Heather Schmidt Bresnahan
Campaign WebsiteHeather Schmidt Bresnahan
Heather Bresnhan graduated from Duquesne Law School in 2001. Passed the Bar in 2001 and has been actively practicing law for 23 years. During Heather’s career she has tried roughly a thousand cases.
Heather’s legal career began as an associate at Goldberg, Gruener, Gentile, Horoho & Avalli, P.C., where Heather had the privilege of working with the late Gary G. Gentile, Esquire among many other accomplished attorneys. In 2009, Heather became a partner at Voelker, Gricks & Schmidt, LLP, and in 2010, she joined Leger & Ball, P.C. (now Fiscus Ball, P.C) as an equity shareholder. In 2016, Heather opened her own practice, Schmidt Bresnahan Law Group, LLC, where she focuses on family law. Heather’s firm provides an array of services, including divorce, child custody, spousal support, protection from abuse, grandparent custody rights, marital agreements, wills, and estate administration. Heather’s 23 years as a family law attorney has provided her with the real world courtroom experience that separates her from other candidates.
In addition to running her practice, Heather also serves as a Hearing Officer with the Allegheny County Retirement Board and volunteers monthly with Neighborhood Legal Services to assist with their Protection from Abuse (PFA) caseload. Throughout her career, Heather has been honored to be named a Pennsylvania Super Lawyer “Rising Star” in Family Law (2006, 2011) and to be recognized as one of Pittsburgh Magazine and the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation’s “50 Finest” young professionals (2005). Heather has also served as a Dormont Borough Council member, a Democratic Party Committee person for Dormont Borough’s 5th District and Secretary of the Brehon Society of Irish Lawmakers.
Heather Schmidt Bresnahan – Questionnaire Response
- Describe your legal experiences in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas including the Civil,Criminal, Family and Orphans Divisions and why these experiences qualify you to be a judge.
I have handled hundreds of cases before all of the Judges that have served on the bench for the past 23 years, including motions, hearings and trials. The majority of my work as an attorney has been in Family Court however, these cases overlap sometimes with civil, criminal or orphans court. I also worked for the District Attorney’s office throughout college and law school. I have a broad understanding of the courts as I have been working one way or another in them since 1991/1992.
I also currently serve as a Hearing Officer for the Allegheny County Retirement Board. - Briefly describe something you have done as an attorney that you are especially proud of and why you are proud of that work.
I have represented hundreds of clients through their family law cases for over 23 years, including child custody, divorce, child support, spousal support, protection from abuse and grandparent custody. These clients are going through some of the worst times of their lives, and they are emotional and scared. It is extremely rewarding to be able to help these clients through their legal cases and I believe that the majority of my client’s feel that they have achieved “justice” at the end of their cases. I have had numerous clients come back to me later in life to send me pictures of their children graduating and telling me that without my representation it may not have been possible. - If elected, describe how you would balance the use of restorative justice tools against delivering procedural justice for the victims of crime and ensuring public safety.
You have to look at the reason why people commit offenses. If it is addictions or mental health, then we need to look to treatment for these individuals to set them up to succeed. Many times, “punishment” will not fix the issue of why someone committed the crime. Restorative Justice is supposed to help the offender understand or “own” what they did and attempt to help the offender “right the wrong” against the victim. Sometimes this is done through family interventions, mediation, etc. Additionally, the specialty courts: Veterans, DUI, Drug Court, Mental Health Court and Phoenix Court can help people with treatment – not jail. These courts are designed for treatment, not jail and they need to be expanded upon. I also believe that we need to have more interaction with medical and psychological providers to help deepen our response to crime. This being said, there are times when I do not believe “restorative justice” would be appropriate and that would most likely be in cases such as murder, sexual assault, domestic violence, sexual offenses, hate crimes, and when someone does not accept responsibility for the crime. - If you are one of the candidates who was recently appointed to the Court of Common Pleas by Gov. Shapiro, and the President Judge has assigned you to a division other than the Family Division, please explain how your professional experience will inform your approach to serving in that Division.
I have been a trial attorney in the family court division for over 23 years. I have handled every type of case imaginable in the family court system and I have a very good reputation among the attorneys of the division and all of the judges as someone who is always prepared, courteous to all and well informed on the law. I would be able to handle any type of case beginning on day 1. I believe that my unique background as a family law attorney for over 23 years sets me apart from the other candidates for office.
Heather Schmidt Bresnahan – Writing Sample
Michael B. Sullivan
Campaign Website
Mike Sullivan
Mike Sullivan graduated from Duquesne University School of Law in 1999. Passed the Bar in 1999 and has been actively practicing law for the 25 years since then. During his career, he has tried approximately 240 cases.
Mike grew up in West View, PA, and graduated from North Hills High School in 1992. He attended Allegheny College, and graduated with a B.A. in Political Science in 1996. Mike began his legal career as an Assistant District Attorney in Venango County. After 2 years, Mike took the same position in Allegheny County. After 22 years (20 of which were in the Domestic Violence Unit), Mike left the D.A.’s office and began working in private practice at Krolikowski Law.
Mike Sullivan – Questionnaire Response
- Describe your legal experiences in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas including the Civil,Criminal, Family and Orphans Divisions and why these experiences qualify you to be a judge.
I have been an attorney for 25 years. I started my legal career in 2000 as an Assistant District Attorney in Venango County. In February 2002, I took the same job at the Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office. In 2005, I was promoted to the Domestic Violence Unit. At that same time, I began receiving Homicide case assignments. Despite requests to move to other units in the DA’s office, I remained in the Domestic Violence Unit until I left the DA’s office at the beginning of 2024. In 2016, I was promoted to Deputy District Attorney, and I became the supervisor of the Domestic Violence Unit and Specialty Courts attorneys (Mental Health Court, DUI Court, Veteran’s Court, Drug Court). Currently, I am an attorney at Krolikowski Law. My practice is primarily in Criminal Defense, but I also handle some Family Law cases, mostly those involving Protection From Abuse Orders. My entire career has been in litigation. As an Assistant District Attorney, I was in a courtroom on a daily basis. As a Deputy District Attorney, my court appearances were less due to administrative and leadership duties, but I still appeared in court at least weekly. In my current practice, I appear in courts across Southwestern PA on at least a weekly basis. Across my career, I have handled every type of criminal case, ranging from traffic tickets to Homicides. I have tried approximately 40-50 jury trials and countless non-jury trials involving crimes such as Adult and Child Sex Assault, Animal Cruelty, Police-involved shootings, Aggravated Assault, Robbery, Attempted Homicide and Homicide. I believe that my experience advocating for victims who feel their cases are less important coupled with my courtroom experience as both a prosecutor and defense attorney uniquely qualifies me to serve on the bench. Throughout my legal career, it has been necessary for me to have the right temperament and sensitivity to allow victims and clients to trust that I care about them and understand the issues they are facing. Lasting 20 years in Domestic Violence Prosecution, in particular, is a testament to my success in this area. I have also been required to engage in a decision-making process that is similar to that of a Judge. I have had to evaluate the admissibility and weight of evidence in order to make vital decisions about cases. I have also had to make life decisions in cases, especially as a Domestic Violence Prosecutor. I always had to think about how an outcome may affect the safety and well-being of the parties involved throughout the case. If elected, these experiences will allow me to thoughtfully analyze legal issues while also taking care to understand the needs of the human beings involved in each case. - Briefly describe something you have done as an attorney that you are especially proud of and why you are proud of that work.
I certainly could point to a specific case I handled or a project that I managed. However, I am especially proud that I spent so much of my career giving victims of Domestic Violence someone they could count on. I was encouraging when I needed to be. I was a shoulder to cry on. I was someone to whom they could vent their frustrations. I’ve been yelled at by victims plenty, but I never yelled back. I listened. I was patient. I asked them to tell me more. And then, I spoke up for them in the courtroom. Advocates often asked me to take the toughest cases and the most difficult victims. I took this as a great compliment, and I take great pride in my body of work in this area.
- If elected, describe how you would balance the use of restorative justice tools against delivering procedural justice for the victims of crime and ensuring public safety.
When determining the outcome of a case, a Judge must take several things into consideration. The Defendant’s background, their counseling/treatment needs, their prior record, and the facts of the current case are important. However, the rights of the victim to be heard are equally important. What was done to a victim, how they were affected by the incident, and whether they have ongoing needs due to the incident are important factors for a Judge to consider. All of these considerations must be balanced when a Judge considers whether to employ the tools of restorative justice. The evidence presented in each case will determine the outcome. However, public safety is of the utmost importance. If the evidence makes it obvious that someone is a risk to public safety, then it will be difficult, if not impossible, to employ the tools of restorative justice. Other sentencing avenues will need to be applied in those instances. - If you are one of the candidates who was recently appointed to the Court of Common Pleas by Gov. Shapiro, and the President Judge has assigned you to a division other than the Family Division, please explain how your professional experience will inform your approach to serving in that Division.
If I am assigned to the Family Division, let me first say that I will do everything in my power to learn what I do not know as quickly as possible. The well-being of the people involved may be at stake, and it is imperative that any Judge make a fair decision based on the law. I will be sure to learn from other Judges and lean on the attorneys to help bring me up to speed on areas of the law where I am lacking. I do not have direct experience with family reunification or divorce actions. I do have a large amount of experience with protection orders. Through that experience, I have also had direct experience with custody issues. As I’ve noted, most of my career has been in the area of Domestic Violence. I believe that this may allow me to have a shorter learning curve than others who do not predominantly practice in Family Law. Unfortunately, Domestic Violence issues are not unique to the Criminal Division. For approximately 15 years, I was the District Attorney assigned to handle Indirect Criminal Contempt (ICC) cases. ICC is the legal charge for violating a Protection From Abuse Order (PFA). These cases are initially assigned in Family Division even though the DA’s office handles many of them. Handling of these cases requires deep knowledge of PFA law as well as some familiarity with custody law. More recently, knowledge of Kayden’s Law is also required. In making decisions in ICC cases, some aspects of Family Law may come into play. Sometimes, the parties have decided to reunite. Other times, the parties cannot agree on much of anything. Sometimes, the custody sections of the PFA are not working as planned, and a new plan needs to be outlined. All the while, there is an incident where the PFA was violated that must be given it's due consideration. These incidents can range from very minor infractions to stalking or assaults. Safety considerations remain at the forefront. These same considerations may be involved in any Family Division case. Additionally, in as a private attorney, I have had clients in the area of Protection From Abuse. I have represented both Plaintiffs and Defendants in this area. These experiences give me a strong base of knowledge for an assignment to Family Division, even though there is still much to learn
Mike Sullivan – Writing Sample
Dennis R. Very
Campaign Website
Dennis Very
Dennis Very graduated from Duquesne Law School in 1995. Passed the Bar in 1995 and has been actively practicing law for the 30 years since then. During his career he has tried 5 cases, since in 2023 alone over 10,000 cases were processed to conclusions and only 27 went to trial.
Dennis’s work in complex civil litigation sets him apart from the other talented candidates. Typically, about one-third of all matters before the court are considered in the Civil Division. The vast majority of candidates have backgrounds in family, criminal, and magisterial proceedings. A few have limited practice in civil law and none have as significant experience as Dennis with complex civil litigation. Given that five out of the eight judicial vacancies are due to vacated seats in the Civil Division, Dennis’s unique legal experience fills a gap in the field of candidates and addresses a critical Court need.
Dennis Very – Questionnaire Response
- Describe your legal experiences in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas including the Civil,Criminal, Family and Orphans Divisions and why these experiences qualify you to be a judge.
Uniquely, my legal experience in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas began prior to graduation from Law School. While in law school, I became a Certified Legal Intern with the Allegheny County Law Department – representing Children and Youth Services during the day and going to law school classes at night. After law school, my legal career focused on civil litigation in Allegheny County, other surrounding Pennsylvania County Courts, and various state and Federal Courts throughout the country. I earned a position with the nationally renowned law firm, formerly, Pepper Hamilton (now, Troutman Pepper Locke), where I zealously represented clients for 10 years and earned promotion concentrating on complex commercial litigation cases. I later joined a Pittsburgh start-up company as Manager of Legal Affairs and Chief Compliance Officer and managed the company’s pre and post filing litigation matters. I left the start-up and returned to fighting for the rights of a wide variety of clients in civil litigation matters including Pennsylvania municipal clients (school district, city, township, borough), protecting individual rights, small business interests, and communities against over development. In my nearly 30-year legal career as a litigation attorney and arbitrator in Allegheny County and beyond, the scope of my work and the range of my litigation experience and clients uniquely qualify me for Judge in the Court of Common Pleas and sets me apart from the other candidates – uniquely filling a current gap on the bench and in this candidate pool as a seasoned civil litigator for almost 30 years. Typically, about one-third of all matters before the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas are considered in the Civil Division. The majority of candidates in this cycle have backgrounds in family law, criminal law and magisterial experience. A few have limited practice in civil litigation and none have significant experience with complex civil litigation that is comparable to my experience. Given that five out of the eight judicial vacancies on the ballot in this election are due to vacated seats in the Civil Division, my unique legal experience fills a gap in this year’s field of candidates and addresses an obvious and critical need on the Court. - Briefly describe something you have done as an attorney that you are especially proud of and why you are proud of that work.
One of, if not the most satisfying thing I have done as an attorney, more than an against the odds great outcome of a case, was my representation during an adoption of two siblings when I worked as a Certified Legal Intern for the Allegheny County Law Department while going to law school at night. I can still so vividly see the smiles of those two children growing wider and wider as they realized the significance of the promises their adoptive parents were making to them, under oath, in court that day. I felt true joy as I watched those two young siblings listen to my questions and the adoptive parents promises to care for them, provide clothes and shelter for them, educate them, and to love them. The older child’s “thank you” was one of the best I ever received. The judge added to the joy by having the children come up to the bench for pictures. To this day, I am proud to have played a small role in those adoptions for that new family. - If elected, describe how you would balance the use of restorative justice tools against delivering procedural justice for the victims of crime and ensuring public safety.
Restorative justice emphasizes repairing the harm caused by criminal actions by engaging offenders with victims and the community. The focus is not on punishment, but accountability, rehabilitation and healing using discussion, understanding, and recovery. Restorative justice would allow victims to receive apologies and talk about the harm caused, facilitate offenders to take responsibility to reduce repeating offenses. Restorative justice may be addressed with utilizing programs: (i) for non-violent crimes, (ii) imposing sentences with community service when appropriate, (iii) with restitution and built in rehabilitation, and (v) to increase focus on and use of Problem Solving Courts – Adult Drug, DUI, Adult Mental Health, and Veterans Courts. This could be beneficial and still deliver procedural justice for the victims of crime. - If you are one of the candidates who was recently appointed to the Court of Common Pleas by Gov. Shapiro, and the President Judge has assigned you to a division other than the Family Division, please explain how your professional experience will inform your approach to serving in that Division.
This cycle, 5 of the 8 judicial vacancies to be filled are vacancies in the Civil Division, my expertise. With this many open Civil Division seats, it does not make sense that eight new judges will be assigned to Family Division. To provide the best service to the County residents, Judges must be skilled in the Division that they preside. In my nearly 30-year legal career as a litigation attorney and arbitrator in Allegheny County and beyond, the scope of my work and the range of my litigation experience and clients uniquely qualify me for Judge in the Court of Common Pleas and sets me apart from the other candidates – uniquely filling a current gap on the bench and in this candidate pool as a seasoned civil litigator for almost 30 years. Typically, about one-third of all matters before the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas are considered in the Civil Division. The majority of candidates in this cycle have backgrounds in family law, criminal law and magisterial experience. A few have limited practice in civil litigation and none have significant experience with complex civil litigation that is comparable to my experience. As stated, given that five out of the eight judicial vacancies on the ballot in this election are due to vacated seats in the Civil Division, my unique legal experience fills a gap in this year’s field of candidates and addresses an obvious and critical need on the Court.I do have experience with the Family Division. While working my way through Law School through Duquesne’s Evening Division, I was a Certified Legal Intern representing Children and Youth Services. I was fortunate to work in the late Justice Max Baer’s courtroom and I witnessed the type of judge that I desire to be – VERY fair, VERY welcoming, and a champion of equal justice. I would work VERY hard in any division that I would be assigned, utilizing the lessons learned from Justice Baer as well as in 30 years of practice.
Dennis Very – Writing Sample
Information to be added.
The following candidates are not recommended by the Allegheny County Bar Association Judiciary Committee
Amy Mathieu
Campaign Website
Amy Mathieu
Amy Mathieu graduated from Pitt Law School in 2016. Passed the Bar in 2016 and has been actively practicing law for the 9 years since then. For the past 7 years Amy has worked as a trial attorney during which time she has litigated thousands of cases to their completion – both sexual abuse claims and employment discrimination claims. Jury trials are not part of her practice area.
Amy started her career clerking for the Honorable Christine Ward, of the Civil Division of the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas. While clerking, she played a role in the creation of the Name Change Court—where trans individuals can safely obtain name changes that match their gender identity. Since then, Amy has spent her career fighting for marginalized communities. She represents survivors of sexual abuse and individuals who have faced discrimination at work based on their race, gender, age, disability, gender identity, or sexual orientation. She has practiced law with compassion, empathy, and understanding for those experiencing the harshness of our justice system. Now, Amy wants to create a courtroom with accessibility, equity, and fairness for all people. As a proud member of the LGBT+ community, Amy hopes that our bench will one day reflect the diversity of our county.
Amy Mathieu – Questionnaire Response
- Describe your legal experiences in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas including the Civil,Criminal, Family and Orphans Divisions and why these experiences qualify you to be a judge.
When I clerked for Judge Ward in the Court of Common Pleas, I learned from one of the best justices in the Commonwealth. I witnessed firsthand how to lead with understanding and compassion, while still adhering to strict legal principles. While practicing plaintiff-side personal injury law, I learned how to truly listen to individuals and work hard to find ways to help them through the complicated civil process. I also gained an incredible amount of experience in litigating cases. I was in the courtroom, in depositions, or in mediation almost every day during my tenure there.
I quickly realized that I wanted to use my litigation skill set to help an exceedingly vulnerable population—victims/ survivors of sexual abuse. Here, I learned how to practice law in a highly client-focused, trauma-informed way. I had very serious, uncomfortable, difficult conversations with clients regularly. I also gained a wealth of experience litigating cases under New York’s window legislation, which allowed victims of childhood sex abuse to bring forward civil claims, regardless of when the original statute of limitations ran. This allowed me to learn how to litigate really difficult, decades- old legal cases.
At my current position, I have the honor of representing hundreds of litigants through employment discrimination matters. Now, I am able to use my empathetic, client-focused approach to help achieve justice for individuals who have lost their jobs, faced horrific discrimination, or lived through a hostile work environment, all because of the color of their skin, their gender, or who they love. I have spent my entire career helping people through the court system. I simply wish to continue to do so from the other side of the courtroom. - Briefly describe something you have done as an attorney that you are especially proud of and why you are proud of that work.
While clerking for the Honorable Christine Ward of Allegheny County’s Civil Division, we started the Special Name Change Court, where trans individuals can safely obtain name changes in our county. Prior to the designated court, trans individuals would have to petition in general motions court full of attorneys, and often the judge, who did not understand why seeking a name change that reflected their gender identity was important. Now, Name Change Court is a monthly celebration, where trans individuals can bring their friends and family. After each Order is read stating the individual’s new name, the court room erupts in applause and support. It’s such a beautiful and meaningful experience for everyone who attends.
It is crucial that judges are dedicated to creating safe and fair environments for everyone. - If elected, describe how you would balance the use of restorative justice tools against delivering procedural justice for the victims of crime and ensuring public safety.
I do not believe that either party is best served by arbitrarily long and brutal detention sentences. As a society, we should be focused on rehabilitation and restoration for both the defendant and the victim. In my current practice, I have represented over 500 survivors of sexual abuse through the civil process. These survivors’ experiences in the courtroom is decided by how they are treated in the courtroom and whether they feel validated–not necessarily the outcome of their case. - If you are one of the candidates who was recently appointed to the Court of Common Pleas by Gov. Shapiro, and the President Judge has assigned you to a division other than the Family Division, please explain how your professional experience will inform your approach to serving in that Division.
My practice focuses on civil law. However, in about half of my cases, I represent survivors of sexual abuse or sexual assault. Many of my clients are minors. It is my job to work with both parents (who are often not married) and the child. I have navigated these tense, traumatic situations with families hundreds of times. Given this experience, I will be able to effectively mediate between ex-partners and stay focused on the best interest of the child.
I have represented clients seeking protective orders following sexual assault.
Amy Matthieu – Writing Sample
Carmen Robinson
Campaign Website
Carmen Robinson
Carmen Robinson graduated from Duquesne University School of Law in 2005. Passed the Bar in 2005 and has been actively practicing law for the 20 years since then. During her career she has tried approximately 50-55 cases.
Carmen is a seasoned Trial Attorney with over two decades of experience trying cases. Additionally, Carmen is an Adjunct Professor and Supervising Attorney at Duquesne University School of Law and serving the Tribone Center for Clinical Legal Education. Carmen served 11 years as a Judicial Law Clerk in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County.
Carmen’s experience is diverse. She served over 15 years as an officer with The Pittsburgh Police where she obtained the rank of Sergeant. In addition to her professional expertise, Carmen is passionate about mentoring young people and shares her insights in the field of law and entrepreneurship. Finally, Carmen is Owner of PLS Transportation, where she specializes in transporting disabled children to school as well as to medical appointments.
Carmen Robinson – Questionnaire Response
- Describe your legal experiences in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas including the Civil,Criminal, Family and Orphans Divisions and why these experiences qualify you to be a judge.
I have nearly twenty years of experience plus a background in law enforcement, I also Clerked under the late Honorable Max Baer, Honorable Dwayne Woodruff and Honorable Kim Berkeley Clark in Family Division. This gave me invaluable judicial system insights. While my practice spans all divisions, 85% has been in Criminal law. As a trial lawyer, I’ve taken cases to jury decisions, including nine murder trials (two death penalty) and serious cases like robbery, burglary, and drug offenses. Additionally, I’ve handled personal injury settlements, as well as estate and trust matters. - Briefly describe something you have done as an attorney that you are especially proud of and why you are proud of that work.
As part of our commitment to pro bono work, My Law Partner and I assist inmates at Allegheny County Jail in obtaining necessary medical care. While the ACLU files lawsuits to enforce civil rights, we address issues directly on the ground. We collect letters and records from physicians to confirm the urgency for medications and advocate for timely treatment. The medical policy at Allegheny Jail is currently inadequate. The jail often delays medications until after intake, which can take up to 72 hours, and faces understaffing and funding challenges that impact inmate care. Recently, we intervened for two clients with severe conditions whose health complaints were ignored. Persistently engaging with warden officials has proven effective in securing urgent care for our clients. - If elected, describe how you would balance the use of restorative justice tools against delivering procedural justice for the victims of crime and ensuring public safety.
The process must ensure a safe environment for all. Encouraging dialogue is key, with victims’ comfort and cooperation central to restorative justice. This approach empowers victims by having them discuss the behavior and harm with offenders, fostering empathy and accountability. Restorative justice aims to “repair the harm,” often overlooked by traditional methods. It can heal communities, address societal issues, and reduce crime. - If you are one of the candidates who was recently appointed to the Court of Common Pleas by Gov. Shapiro, and the President Judge has assigned you to a division other than the Family Division, please explain how your professional experience will inform your approach to serving in that Division.
As mentioned earlier, I have a decade of experience as a law clerk in the Family Division for both Honorable Kim B. Clark and Dwayne Woodruff. Additionally, I served as a clerk one The PA Supreme Court for the late Honorable Justice Baer, who frequently authored opinions on Family Law matters. He was also a Family Court Judge. These roles have provided me with substantial knowledge and experience, enabling me to effectively preside from the outset. While every judge must develop their own approach, I would incorporate some of the esteemed characteristics observed in my mentors. I am committed to demonstrating empathy, integrity, and accountability to all individuals appearing before my Court.
Carmen Robinson – Writing Sample
Sarra Terry
Campaign Website
Sarra Terry
Sarra Terry graduated from Duquesne University School of Law in 2011, passed the bar in 2011 and has been actively practicing law since then. For the past 13 years she has worked as a criminal defense trial attorney. During that tie she has tried approximately 10 cases and litigated 30 motions.
Sarra was raised in a working-class, union family in Millvale, PA, where she learned the values of hard work and standing up for what’s right. She put herself through college and law school at Duquesne University. Growing up during the height of the heroin epidemic, Sarra witnessed the devastating effects of substance abuse in her community, which inspired her to pursue a career in criminal defense. After passing the bar exam, she has been advocating for her clients for the past thirteen years.
Additionally, Sarra has served as a Judicial Law Clerk to the Honorable Paul Cozza in the Family Division of the Court of Common Pleas since 2012. In this role, she has authored hundreds of judicial opinions and assisted the judge with thousands of Adult Family and Juvenile Court matters. Sarra currently resides in Ross Township with her husband and two sons.
Sarra Terry – Questionnaire Response
- Describe your legal experiences in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas including the Civil,Criminal, Family and Orphans Divisions and why these experiences qualify you to be a judge.
I have experience in all four of the divisions of the Court of Common Pleas. I have been a practicing attorney in the Adult Criminal Division for the past thirteen years. As a part of my practice, I also handle civil matters and landlord/tenant actions. These types of cases are litigated in the Civil Division. In addition, I have handled over one hundred statutory appeals in this Division as well. I was a judicial law clerk in the Family Division for twelve years. In that role, I assisted the judge with Adult Family matters like divorce and custody. In addition, I also worked with the judge on his Juvenile Court cases. The role required me to prepare him for any trials as well as hundreds of motions. The majority of the legal writing that I have done as a law clerk has been in the Orphan’s Court Division. I have written hundreds of opinions in support of the judge’s decision to grant or deny petitions terminating parental rights. This broad range of experience has given me a unique skillset and an in-depth understanding of how each of the divisions work. I understand much of the law specific to each division as well as the local and state rules. - Briefly describe something you have done as an attorney that you are especially proud of and why you are proud of that work.
Over the past thirteen years, I have gotten the opportunity to assist clients with the preparation of Pardon Applications. The majority of my clients have experienced some form of mental health or substance abuse issues. Often times, people in active addiction will have multiple arrests and convictions within a relatively short period of time. When they do the hard work of getting sober, they are often left with low paying jobs because of their criminal records. I have been able to help many of these individuals obtain pardons and have their criminal records expunged. This has allowed for them to return to college, to secure better employment, or to volunteer for their children’s activities. I am so proud of this because it is exactly how our justice system should work. If we want more productive citizens and neighbors, it is vital that we give them the opportunity for redemption. If a person achieves meaningful recovery and takes the steps necessary to change their lives, allowing them to pursue both professional and personal goals makes for a stronger community. - If elected, describe how you would balance the use of restorative justice tools against delivering procedural justice for the victims of crime and ensuring public safety.
The best way to approach this delicate balance is to give everyone a voice. Often times, victims of non-violent crimes are open to diversionary measures and do genuinely want the offender to get the help they need. Sometimes they are more interested in punishment. Even though I have a treatment driven practice, I understand that there will be victims of non-violent crimes which would prefer punishment over rehabilitation. They should be able to express their wishes as well. The personality of a judge sets the tone for the courtroom and all of people in it. So, if a judge can allow the victim to be heard but also offer some insight into restorative justice practices, it may provide them with information that they did not know or had not considered. With respect to violent crimes, public safety has to be the most important consideration. However, treatment should always be a part of a sentence if it is appropriate. I have always found the Victim Impact Panels to be incredibly useful for these types of crimes. Providing offenders with these powerful messages creates a greater sense of understanding of the impacts of the crime. - If you are one of the candidates who was recently appointed to the Court of Common Pleas by Gov. Shapiro, and the President Judge has assigned you to a division other than the Family Division, please explain how your professional experience will inform your approach to serving in that Division.
I have served as a judicial law clerk in the Family Division for the last twelve years. I am intimately familiar with both Adult Family and Juvenile Court cases. The most important thing that a judge must remember is that these are often highly charged and emotional cases. Decisions about custody or the termination of someone’s parental rights will change the life of a child immensely. Having this knowledge and working alongside of a judge has prepared me to be able to start on day one. In addition, my work as a criminal defense attorney has given me a greater understanding of both mental health and substance abuse issues. These come up so frequently in the family division so my experience in this regard with be incredibly helpful to connect parents and juveniles with the services they need.
Sarra Terry – Writing Sample
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justices up for Retention
Christine Donohue
Campaign Website
Christine Donohue
After receiving the 14th Ward Independent Democratic Club’s endorsement, Christine Donohue was elected to a ten-year term on The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in November 2015 and began serving as a Supreme Court Justice in January 2016.
Prior to her service as a Supreme Court Justice, Justice Donohue served on the Superior Court of Pennsylvania for eight years.
She was born in Schuykill County and was raised in Lansford in Carbon County. She attended Marian High School in Hometown, PA. After receiving her Bachelor Arts degree from East Stroudsburg University, she moved to the Shamokin area in Northumberland County and was employed by SEDA-Council of Governments in Lewisburg as an environmental project coordinator for two years. Justice Donohue moved to Pittsburgh to attend the Duquesne University School of Law where she earned her Juris Doctor degree and served on the Duquesne Law Review.
As a lawyer, Justice Donohue was a civil trial lawyer and litigator for 27 years. She was a shareholder in the law firm, Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney, P.C. and was the practice manager of the commercial litigation department in its predecessor firm, Klett Rooney Lieber & Schorling, P.C. While in practice, she held the AV rating from Martindale-Hubbell, she was listed in Best Lawyers in America, Pennsylvania Super Lawyers and the Top 50 Attorneys in Pittsburgh. She is an elected Fellow of the American College of Trial Lawyers, International Academy of Trial Lawyers, Academy of Trial Lawyers of Allegheny County and the American Board of Trial Advocates. She is a past president of the Western Pennsylvania Trial Lawyers Association.
Neumann – Questionnaire
1. Describe your legal experiences in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas including the Civil, Criminal, Family and Orphans Divisions and why these experiences qualify you to be a judge.
I am currently in my 8th year as a judge in Washington County running for Superior Court. I presided over family law cases, dependency matters, criminal matters, civil matters, and veterans court. I am an appointed member, by the Governor, to the Sheriff and Deputy Sheriff Training and Education Board. I am also an appointed member, by the Speaker of the House, to America250PA. I was elected to four terms in the PA House of Representatives. While in the legislature, the Speaker of the House appointed me to the PA Commission on Sentencing, the Attorney General appointed me to a committee on the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency, and I held various other positions while in the legislature.
While in the PA House, I was the prime sponsor of HB 272, requiring among other things that sexual assault testing kits be processed in a timely manner. This legislation continues to provide timely justice to sexual assault victims. Prior to being elected judge, I was a trial attorney for a firm in Pittsburgh where I was named one of the top trial lawyers in Pennsylvania under the age of 40 multiple times.
2. Briefly describe something you have done as an attorney that you are especially proud of and why you are proud of that work.
I am in my 8th year as a judge and I am proud of all the work I’ve done while on the bench. I am also proud of the meaningful work I did as a plaintiffs’ attorney protecting vulnerable senior citizens who were abused in nursing home settings.
3. If elected, describe how you would balance the use of restorative justice tools against delivering procedural justice for the victims of crime and ensuring public safety.
Since I am already a judge and preside over Veterans Court (a diversionary program), I will continue to implement all the tools available to make sure the defendant does not recidivate and protect the community with proper monitoring. As an appellate judge, I will volunteer to be part of committees to enhance programs across the commonwealth.
Kevin M. Dougherty
Campaign Website
Kevin M. Dougherty
After winning the Democratic primary election, Kevin M. Dougherty was elected to a ten-year term on the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in November 2015 and began serving as a Supreme Court Justice in January 2016.
Kevin Dougherty received an undergraduate degree from Temple University in 1985 and a J.D. from the Antioch School of Law in 1987. Prior to his service on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, he served as a judge on the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas from 2001 to 2015 and as a special master in the Philadelphia Family Court Truancy Program from 1998 to 2000. He worked as an assistant district attorney in Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania from 1990 to 1995, and as a private practice attorney from 1989 to 1990 and 1995 to 2001.
David Wecht
Campaign Website
David Wecht
After receiving the 14th Ward Independent Democratic Club’s endorsement, David N. Wecht was elected to a ten-year term on The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in November 2015 and began serving as a Supreme Court Justice in January 2016.
Prior to joining the Supreme Court, Justice Wecht served as a Judge of The Superior Court of Pennsylvania from January 2012 to January 2016, and as a Judge on The Court of Common Pleas for Pennsylvania’s Fifth Judicial District from February 2003 to January 2012.
From January 2009 to January 2011, Justice Wecht served by appointment of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania as Administrative Judge of the Fifth Judicial District’s Family Division, which encompasses both domestic relations cases and cases of juvenile dependency and delinquency. As Administrative Judge, Justice Wecht designed and implemented several reforms and innovations, including the Unified Family Court, the local rule on parenting coordination, and improved conflict counsel appointments in juvenile cases.
Prior to taking the bench, Justice Wecht was twice elected as the Allegheny County Register of Wills and Clerk of Orphans’ Court. In that capacity, he pioneered innovations that included creation of a free will consultation program for seniors and authorship of a state law that prevents accused murderers from controlling their victims’ estates.
Justice Wecht is a 1984 Summa Cum Laude, Phi Beta Kappa graduate of Yale, where he was a National Merit Scholar and earned Yale College Distinction in both history and political science. At Yale Law School, Justice Wecht was selected as Notes Editor of the Yale Law Journal, and as an Editor of both the Yale Law & Policy Review and the Yale Journal of International Law. While a law student, he also volunteered as a certified legal intern in the Office of the State’s Attorney in New Haven, Connecticut, and provided pro bono legal assistance to inmates of the Green Haven Correctional Facility in Stormville, New York.
Judicial retention elections – sometimes called “merit retention” – are a process that was introduced in Pennsylvania’s 1968 Constitution and are unique to Pennsylvania. Both trial and appellate court judges face retention elections every ten years. Retention elections are nonpartisan, and designed to give the people a chance to weigh in on whether sitting judges are performing their duties well, not to choose based on policy preferences. Going into the 1967 Constitutional Convention that adopted our current Constitution, the Committee that laid the groundwork for that Convention said:
This system combines the direct election by the people with a nonpartisan, noncompetitive reelection, but it eliminates the rigors of a campaign for the incumbent judge, retains his skill and experience and permits the electorate to pass on his qualifications and fitness for office as demonstrated by his prior term of office.
The Committee did not appear to have considered the possibility of female judges based on its use of pronouns: it was, after all, 1967.
This year, three Supreme Court Justices, a Superior Court Judge, and a Commonwealth Court Judge are up for retention, along with Common Pleas Judges across the Commonwealth. The options for voters will not be one judge or another in each of these elections: instead, voters will simply vote yes or no on each judge: should they remain on the bench or not?
The American Bar Association has set out standards voters should consider when determining whether a judge should be retained. Those are “Preparation, attentiveness and control over judicial proceedings; judicial management skills; courtesy to litigants, counsel, and court personnel; public disciplinary sanctions; and quality of judicial opinions.”
This is traditionally how judges have been evaluated in retention elections, but this year a partisan effort is expected to attempt to remove currently sitting judges who are regarded by some partisan political actors as insufficiently tractable, especially in the appellate courts. It is vitally important to maintaining the independence of the judiciary that voters look to the judicial merit of the judges before them, not the efforts of politicians and billionaires to create a judiciary that will serve not the law, but their political ends.
For that reason, the 14th Ward Independent Democratic Club has invited sitting appellate judges up for retention to speak to our members at our annual endorsement meeting to explain why they should be retained, and will vote on whether to endorse those judges for retention for the first time in our history.
